Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A85006AF4 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:23:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 89295 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:23:48 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 89259 invoked by uid 500); 13 Jun 2011 23:23:48 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 89251 invoked by uid 99); 13 Jun 2011 23:23:48 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:23:48 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com designates 209.85.212.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.212.52] (HELO mail-vw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.212.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 23:23:42 +0000 Received: by vws16 with SMTP id 16so5933836vws.11 for ; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:23:21 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=B4VBEaAjoCCLQgC7En2yZuoxzvvmLPPWVxxxlC2eTlM=; b=xmUXbqQ6TymcMan3G+78TZUQLkMQoeQh9/KUFiJn1nKP3bYR6bOPACqs8EqGf1HjF7 OgdgSBmVVR/kz8rutnRgT8JBLnHuqlhe0ey6diFyyqUO/gWwaR/WZb5gZS0fjNkG5OUM hUkePAldIklykO1PbI3/qaepua0lDPggdcgJI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=Nz2XNXgFcaSMOGJdBRvEf5S73sMQIuTHuxtnRF3AjqIXZhA4jd42BHB3fwgej7F/c3 yGKdBxrnG3CNA2gUKNM03A32uc3whSf32XGAnHYYeAIcyzcFQsG5MWsNpr0IJaUgjNOV CwM8ukSqv+ONgZfGSjK0si2G4Wwc/mHw11s9Y= Received: by 10.52.98.5 with SMTP id ee5mr823759vdb.200.1308007401225; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:23:21 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.52.161.100 with HTTP; Mon, 13 Jun 2011 16:22:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Paul Davis Date: Mon, 13 Jun 2011 19:22:41 -0400 Message-ID: Subject: Commits to 1.1.x not in 1.0.x To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I was just going through what we back ported to 1.1.x to make sure that all the relevant commits are also on 1.0.x before rolling a release. There are a few that are mostly trivial but I've come across two that I'm a bit stumped on. The first is this one: * https://github.com/davisp/couchdb/commit/a0563ab7ce204cf82feb56259d7a52c0b84077b7 Large contiguous conflict in share/www/script/test/design_docs.js that I'm not sure if I can just choose this patched version or not. The patch to util.js applies cleanly, but the diff to design_docs.js results in a fairly large conflict. It may be a simple code move with indentation difference but if someone could eyeball that closer that'd help. The second is: * https://github.com/davisp/couchdb/commit/d952ac01cb4cd4ae5ceb0c8cc079acf595ff9747 Appears to rely on mochiweb_request:accepts_content_type which does not appear to exist in 1.0.x I'm not even sure if this is relevant to the 1.0.x branch or was a fix for something introduced in the 1.1.x branch with the various content-type changes and what not. Again, if someone would eyeball this that is more familiar with the interaction with jquery/futon that'd be a help. Thanks