Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 023DD4433 for ; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 14:47:43 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58210 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 14:47:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 58164 invoked by uid 500); 6 Jun 2011 14:47:42 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 58156 invoked by uid 99); 6 Jun 2011 14:47:42 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:47:42 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of klimpong@gmail.com designates 209.85.218.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.218.52] (HELO mail-yi0-f52.google.com) (209.85.218.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 14:47:36 +0000 Received: by yia13 with SMTP id 13so2113792yia.11 for ; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 07:47:15 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; bh=8FggTe1z9NE5uQ1k3aCgpH5KRk+0HPZDc3QBiUot2VU=; b=fHRM3rXPYok6IyUiN+y6SHgc4MIL7qj/b5/oqpA2nFteugfa9bsCzgZSJnB8dr4nco a1R1BL24Zq7ja8021qJi074OJAmJ3fnNWvTKBrylS+jWH5BdcntvTH7Ml+cpUN7UVFjq Z4efhpRk6AC1C1mzeGBTFifbyQ660PPgnNj1A= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:sender:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; b=DB2W9ljM41lwm8xAKOR0tfgx0cSqfzw/low4xsysdFRlICWoOjayVSpgvLwhpDVFhW xn/35P1DyzHnG2m9iczA7STVQAhuI61/HtidIwt7E0Tvi39iQlh6/svvf0xN/pXB3Iss biWCCEnXIvEGt0rm8bv22zdmMMwE8D3miBOdY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.152.9 with SMTP id c9mr6546508yhk.38.1307371635451; Mon, 06 Jun 2011 07:47:15 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: till@php.net Sender: klimpong@gmail.com Received: by 10.236.69.202 with HTTP; Mon, 6 Jun 2011 07:47:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 6 Jun 2011 16:47:15 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: wUzu0aTxfhasuKnLOmjLYqKeOx0 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Archiving old releases From: till To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Mon, Jun 6, 2011 at 4:44 PM, Robert Newson wrote: > All, > > Now that 1.1.0 is released I want your opinions on which releases we > should archive. > > For my part, I'd like Downloads to hold just 1.1.0 and 1.0.2 and > archive everything else. > > B. > Generally, +1 Does 'archiving' break download links? Till