Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 289766CE2 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:27:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 34046 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 08:27:14 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 33999 invoked by uid 500); 16 Jun 2011 08:27:14 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 33991 invoked by uid 99); 16 Jun 2011 08:27:14 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:27:14 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.52] (HELO mail-qw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.216.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 08:27:07 +0000 Received: by qwb8 with SMTP id 8so817701qwb.11 for ; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:26:46 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date :message-id:subject:from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=XF+Az1z785fNI2y6swVwqmjEgnNhajuMJLbX3vR7Ans=; b=bGSiimi0BRFE4n9BJxUnz145xXCnbEz8IRGnUGHc0nkaK6CA2RXdHmzIhdn8eJ3yh0 OCdqffqCQ/tzH8rHE+V0IhGVCX6kqefgHMOJqanUlEqv8njwXnjnwyDwqkgkUa9/8RI6 l22+JOARXFhaUrndx7DY4rk4HaVPw/su55WIQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=bel241F2zCONO5N+HA+xQSeX2eamgzJdlC56LOMYxq5C/4jzh/Hq1WldP/Xbn8v1DU FUObybAJsyRRHqPkzMfzVtk3vxK93/LYjQPNJqq1HPHnO9rIu1NLtahy98nMd2mZJQo7 qTsP7DrJ3xwEZVV+JxXxQJGHC8O0MnbB2yLLU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.18.81 with SMTP id v17mr513357qca.7.1308212806248; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:26:46 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.78.133 with HTTP; Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:26:46 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Thu, 16 Jun 2011 01:26:46 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Time to delete 0.11.2? From: Benoit Chesneau To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Thu, Jun 16, 2011 at 1:21 AM, Robert Newson wr= ote: > The "Archiving old releases" thread. I said "How about we keep 1.1.0, > 1.0.2 and 0.11.2 then?" and all replies concurred. I further said "I > don't think we should be encouraging downloads of 0.11.2, so I'd like > to archive it > soon.", but at no point did we pick a time. > > This is all noise, Paul should blow away 0.11.2 in the housekeeping > phase of 1.0.3. > > B. > Well the fact that there was an existing thread but no action have been taken make this one even more important and maybe this time we can conclude by an action :) This is the joy of asynchronous mails anyway. - beno=EEt