From dev-return-16940-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Tue Jun 28 16:24:36 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 99CB76385 for ; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 13015 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 16:24:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 12915 invoked by uid 500); 28 Jun 2011 16:24:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 12907 invoked by uid 99); 28 Jun 2011 16:24:35 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:24:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=5.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of dionne@dionne-associates.com designates 67.222.55.9 as permitted sender) Received: from [67.222.55.9] (HELO oproxy7-pub.bluehost.com) (67.222.55.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 16:24:28 +0000 Received: (qmail 7744 invoked by uid 0); 28 Jun 2011 16:24:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO host183.hostmonster.com) (74.220.207.183) by oproxy7.bluehost.com with SMTP; 28 Jun 2011 16:24:05 -0000 DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=default; d=dionne-associates.com; h=Received:Content-Type:Mime-Version:Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Content-Transfer-Encoding:Message-Id:References:To:X-Mailer:X-Identified-User; b=p8ARza4dkn8hCo3/Ru0FHch7fHxcZXzdu2+d+B+rDHzm5mMfduWeIkfdUWZPCyh1ITmgPjXmm8cTdgESf3qlYGgZwoQQlE5mCr4gLhxZDVRyzbR4Vv6DX4ubnZhyy2+w; Received: from dsl-67-158-176-71.fairpoint.net ([67.158.176.71] helo=[192.168.2.101]) by host183.hostmonster.com with esmtpa (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from ) id 1Qbb53-0008Jc-A7 for dev@couchdb.apache.org; Tue, 28 Jun 2011 10:24:05 -0600 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.3 Release From: Robert Dionne In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 28 Jun 2011 12:24:03 -0400 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <7001D3AA-1A25-418B-918F-F036835A15F7@dionne-associates.com> References: <1F84F64A-093C-47D3-9732-FED68DC2F025@googlemail.com> <0DA7F2FC-99AA-4904-A04E-14DB9FC4B32C@apache.org> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Identified-User: {2551:host183.hostmonster.com:dionneas:dionne-associates.com} {sentby:smtp auth 67.158.176.71 authed with dionne@dionne-associates.com} X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org I don't think they are officially part of the "test procedure", if so = then we've shipped a lot of releases with them failing. In fact they = never run completely, once in a blue moon. Perhaps I shouldn't have = mentioned it in my +1 vote. I run them almost every time I do a build = from trunk, almost always the issues are related to the two different JS = execution environments. I've started a topic branch to separate out [1] = these tests from the browser based Futon tests. Ideally these would be = part of "make check". SHIP IT!!! [1] https://github.com/bdionne/couchdb/tree/cli-tests On Jun 28, 2011, at 12:11 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >=20 > On 28 Jun 2011, at 17:09, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: >=20 >>> Perhaps there is some good reason for them failing? >>=20 >> I was not aware that the javascript CLI tests are "officially" ready = to use yet. In that case it's definitely not okay if they are failing = and since others have seen the same failing tests, I'd change my vote to = =E2=88=921. >=20 > If they are not ready to use yet, that is a good reason for them = failing. If they should be part of the test procedure, then they should = a) pass and b) be added to the wiki. Sorry for being so ARGH about it, = but I like to run a tight ship, so we should get clarification on this = either way. Thanks! >=20