Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 377345424 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:32:16 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 58211 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 13:32:15 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 58177 invoked by uid 500); 10 May 2011 13:32:15 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 58169 invoked by uid 99); 10 May 2011 13:32:15 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:32:15 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=5.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [80.244.253.218] (HELO mail.traeumt.net) (80.244.253.218) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 10 May 2011 13:32:08 +0000 Received: from dahlia.local (p5795BF95.dip.t-dialin.net [87.149.191.149]) (using TLSv1 with cipher AES128-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.traeumt.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id C95F83C169 for ; Tue, 10 May 2011 15:31:47 +0200 (CEST) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084) Subject: Re: Helping out with releases From: Jan Lehnardt In-Reply-To: Date: Tue, 10 May 2011 15:31:47 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <49785B98-AD1A-4152-94FA-D8BB746E6A5C@apache.org> References: <6138108C-77C0-49CB-9E51-26C54858F624@apache.org> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1084) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 10 May 2011, at 15:28, Paul Davis wrote: > On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 9:24 AM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >>=20 >> On 10 May 2011, at 15:21, Paul Davis wrote: >>=20 >>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 8:29 AM, Dirkjan Ochtman = wrote: >>>> On Tue, May 10, 2011 at 14:08, Paul Davis = wrote: >>>>> Like Jan says, it'd be awesome to have more people familiar with = the >>>>> release procedure. Although if you're interested in speeding up >>>>> releases the best place to start would be by learning some = internals. >>>>> The issues that usually keep things from shipping is that a test = is >>>>> randomly failing or there's a bug waiting to be fixed. >>>>=20 >>>> Right, but that's not the case now, is it? So I would like to help = out >>>> with all the non-internals and chasing after other committers to = fix >>>> up the bugs, as that seems an area that's currently understaffed. >>>>=20 >>>> Which doesn't mean that maybe I won't get into the internals at = some >>>> point, but I think doing the other things could be valuable to, and >>>> the project needs more of it. >>>>=20 >>>> Cheers, >>>>=20 >>>> Dirkjan >>>>=20 >>>=20 >>> I haven't run through prepping the 1.1.x branch for a release, but >>> 1.0.3 is being held up because I've sen the 090 and 140 etap tests >>> fail and no one (me included) has felt like fixing them yet. >>=20 >> This is the first time I hear of this (I'm a little behind on JIRA), >> is there a ticket for this? What system specs do you have where you >> see the errors? >>=20 >> Cheers >> Jan >> -- >>=20 >>=20 >>=20 >=20 > New 13" MBA. I've seen the 090 and 140 etap tests both fail. New 13" > MBA. I can get 140 to reproduce by running it many times. Haven't yet > tried to reproduce 090 (but it was during a distcheck for anyone > trying). Is this on SSD or spinning disk? Cheers Jan --=20