Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1084)
Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, round 2.
From: Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <BANLkTimtfJvCbV_huRtPFYEAizgmTp7J=Q@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 30 May 2011 11:22:42 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <249D9C1D-9FD3-45F1-9C3F-DC4E4903F3FA@apache.org>
References: <BANLkTi=Nuki4TLJQVEmC2ASms8TK53nzqA@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTi=X6pp1QLatgK=bKzer4Hoe0Tza2A@mail.gmail.com>
 <BANLkTinvK6F_C8T3jQmMMnWpG_knFCxrPg@mail.gmail.com>
 <A48F9D12-0BB4-40DE-ADA1-E7665D32A594@apache.org>
 <BANLkTimtfJvCbV_huRtPFYEAizgmTp7J=Q@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org


On 30 May 2011, at 11:11, Benoit Chesneau wrote:

> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 11:05 AM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org> wrote:
>>=20
>> On 30 May 2011, at 10:50, Benoit Chesneau wrote:
>>=20
>>> On Mon, May 30, 2011 at 2:23 AM, Dave Cottlehuber <dave@muse.net.nz> =
wrote:
>>>> On 29 May 2011 05:26, Robert Newson <robert.newson@gmail.com> =
wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>=20
>>>>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.1.0 release, =
round 2.
>>>>=20
>>>> Thanks Bob & all - that is a *lot* of bugs squashed!!
>>>>=20
>>>> md5, sha, etaps all good.
>>>> Mac OS X 10.6.7
>>>> NB I needed to do `brew link icu4c` to get couchdb ./configure to =
work.
>>>> ffox passes except for replication {"error": "not_found"}; logs at
>>>> http://friendpaste.com/2IS0zh1PjEAmJrgtqWp66u
>>>>=20
>>>> Swapping R14B01 in for R14B03 -> replication tests pass again as
>>>> discussed on IRC.
>>>>=20
>>>=20
>>> using R14B93, and still have the replication error. Tests with =
safari
>>> just block on replication and never end. I'm -1 until that's fixed.
>>> Will open/update a ticket with logs.
>>=20
>> In case it is unclear, it is R14B03 that introduces this error, 01
>> and 02 are fine.
>>=20
>> Cheers
>> Jan
>> --
>>=20
>>=20
> Does it means 1.1 is supporting <=3D R14B01 only ? In that case we
> should be clear about it in README imo. We actually we say:
>=20
>  * Erlang OTP (>=3DR12B5)       (http://erlang.org/)
>=20
>=20
> Also in this case I will recheck with this version and others. (would
> be good if we had a bot doing that)

I don't think we came to any conclusions yet. I agree that we should
do so and make the correct change in the README and ./configure version
checks.

Ideally, we should be compatible with latest releases. Now, 02 =
introduced
a few instabilities that I believe we have worked around, and 03 fixes
them on the Erlang side. So while not advisable, we currently support =
<=3D02
and 03 is a rather fresh release.

I think it'd be worth halting this vote in favour of fixing =
replication.js
with 03, but I'll let Robert make that call.

Cheers
Jan
--=20