From dev-return-15887-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Fri Apr 29 00:40:54 2011 Return-Path: X-Original-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: from mail.apache.org (hermes.apache.org [140.211.11.3]) by minotaur.apache.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6A27C394A for ; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:40:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: (qmail 4015 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 00:40:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 3974 invoked by uid 500); 29 Apr 2011 00:40:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 3966 invoked by uid 99); 29 Apr 2011 00:40:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:40:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.7 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,RFC_ABUSE_POST,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of klimpong@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.180] (HELO mail-gy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.160.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 29 Apr 2011 00:40:47 +0000 Received: by gyf2 with SMTP id 2so1687295gyf.11 for ; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:40:26 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to :references:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=B6gLAk3XIEVoTE25XrasfBj49rbPVRkS1FJkS/jSIUM=; b=AOohJtA9vuvnwzjDUFar9SNofa9gqpR3sjHBu3Zywh10uq9pAfRLcjT5anz0WFCK+S awjr74l4og3PpdlCxs+nX8jmC7P96nld1O6GnoUNDDr7TVpANb3gas7qOg/QqSZSjnAj gUVs3ADhbV87bw6tmKiM2dtzBCIcNsr0AsNuY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:sender:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=KeBAm+lnb6PO0uOOV7EjpcygVsiuNCxW9WqGOrfCM+JwsapDY9XqQ5kEKtYM/tJa1o 2Ntgj1iWYLyAVXS/eviCJNkn00Xc3l/eDVEw3M6aXm56TU97qtzoBJGh4ZXsp2BgKOBW /q+an7uOrS1nyUAkKBPBNWKRvDGBx2kb/T1Co= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.236.161.132 with SMTP id w4mr5623975yhk.22.1304037626366; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:40:26 -0700 (PDT) Sender: klimpong@gmail.com Reply-To: till@php.net Received: by 10.236.102.177 with HTTP; Thu, 28 Apr 2011 17:40:26 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4DBA088F.3060908@meetinghouse.net> References: <4DB9A74C.8030502@meetinghouse.net> <4DBA088F.3060908@meetinghouse.net> Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2011 02:40:26 +0200 X-Google-Sender-Auth: Fc-z0LmMp8z_OahWH8wSc1nlg6M Message-ID: Subject: Re: Development environment From: till To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 2:38 AM, Miles Fidelman wrote: > Andrey Somov wrote: >> >> On Fri, Apr 29, 2011 at 1:01 AM, Paul >> Daviswrote: >> >> >>> >>> On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 6:57 PM, Nathan Stott =A0wro= te: >>> >>>> >>>> So couchdb is really developed without using step-by-step debugging at >>>> all? =A0That seems quite odd. >>>> >>>> >>> >>> I never use step by step debugging on any project in any language. >>> I've never found it that useful. >>> >>> >> >> step by step debugging of a unit test is one the most effective ways to >> find >> bugs. >> >> > > Until you start running highly concurrent software, distributed across > multiple nodes. =A0That takes debugging to a whole new level. > A unit test doesn't run on multiple nodes.