Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of trophybase@googlemail.com
 designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=googlemail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=KJ6KPRhG3wGuY8PJigOKdXX+fUytdUfXxZetzup3VGsBGnLVV8y9MJLA4LswPhmCEM
         onRowuIiLYCOrfhLAkwONPvV6b1UV2KomdlhE4pbMX0p287pAjeu4pPJgGdoQuWjyqEz
         Cr30+zrlW6k9UFqgZ+uqjvmQ1l2x0qt7DL2Ns=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2011 15:43:38 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=PfxgHprGzAVyPxqtu0N1FkUW5XPW1RVx7yduL@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Tree::term() is really a tree()
From: Andrey Somov <trophybase@googlemail.com>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=90e6ba6151ba254874049e0dc158

--90e6ba6151ba254874049e0dc158
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

Hi all,
I have found the following comment in the source (couch_db.hrl):

% Tree::term() is really a tree(), but we don't want to require R13B04 yet
-type branch() :: {Key::term(), Value::term(), Tree::term()}.

Does it mean that CouchDB includes its own copy of gb_trees.erl ?
Does it mean that CouchDB implements its own tree but the interface is
identical to gb_trees.erl and it will be changed once R13B04 is required ?


-
Andrey

--90e6ba6151ba254874049e0dc158--