Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 93817 invoked from network); 13 Feb 2011 01:06:54 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 13 Feb 2011 01:06:54 -0000 Received: (qmail 49448 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2011 01:06:53 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 49337 invoked by uid 500); 13 Feb 2011 01:06:53 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 49321 invoked by uid 99); 13 Feb 2011 01:06:53 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:06:53 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.9 required=5.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,FS_REPLICA,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com designates 209.85.213.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.213.180] (HELO mail-yx0-f180.google.com) (209.85.213.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Sun, 13 Feb 2011 01:06:45 +0000 Received: by yxd30 with SMTP id 30so1689338yxd.11 for ; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:06:24 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to :content-type; bh=4LKrCEZsSZQ2Z8nAS/KiR83ljm6Hb8Ec4n2PiGiJmrs=; b=wJHT7GS9bG5tzmsl0X+uJc6Jyq/y9isKwHYg47natt23Wpt6668gcffwbKKXGG3Lmk FNi2CfbXiJPhkbFa3iqhkkyZgARTbDioR9RD82+tJcZv7iOVVV4laZSZW58vF+oRbl7q WooaFlXSQDFpWPQCEx8ReZ1p+dr65MWQYLCYY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to:content-type; b=rCJZRYQg7Vc3vXMpV5F5nHQooClhMiBl6xoCJZtJC4J/MPfM86n22fbI+H9lS2ZLSd wp3wo/EamLtR7f3eawktFEVYjFXwPDnx7lnt/equFsvYBfHBfCME58MZZYmFszUc8hKk CsDxMyEe3FpS9bR+OjpY9vKB3DljAvxmoiFqM= Received: by 10.147.83.17 with SMTP id k17mr2902498yal.9.1297559184144; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:06:24 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.147.33.7 with HTTP; Sat, 12 Feb 2011 17:05:43 -0800 (PST) From: Paul Davis Date: Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:05:43 -0500 Message-ID: Subject: Replication spam To: dev@couchdb.apache.org, user@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Just an update, There's been a number of people complaining about emails being rejected as spam when discussing replication. The current theory is that due to some spam assassin rules that look for the occurrence of "replica" (as in, fake watches) in subjects and bodies coupled with sending emails as HTML would be enough to flag a message as spam. Notice that the second half of that theory is for sending emails as HTML. If you run into this issue can you check if you're sending HTML or not? Gmail being a popular client that likes to send things as HTML unless you click on the "Plain Text" link just above the message body text area. Also, if you have emails that were rejected can you forward the message id's from the rejected emails (not the rejection notice). Thanks, Paul Davis