Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2217 invoked from network); 26 Jan 2011 13:20:37 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 26 Jan 2011 13:20:37 -0000 Received: (qmail 71182 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 13:20:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 71151 invoked by uid 500); 26 Jan 2011 13:20:34 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 71143 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2011 13:20:33 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:20:33 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:20:31 +0000 Received: (qmail 2191 invoked by uid 99); 26 Jan 2011 13:20:09 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [192.168.0.3]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username nslater, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:20:09 +0000 Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 Release, Round 3 Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Noah Slater In-Reply-To: <23DA50BE-2D95-48E2-B0FD-95234B544E40@apache.org> X-Noah: Awesome Date: Wed, 26 Jan 2011 13:20:06 +0000 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <5437B959-48CA-446F-A6F5-DCDD0BC09B0F@apache.org> References: <1331C7A6-7772-498B-9852-47685E3A77BE@apache.org> <8EE9C841-4C83-4201-B343-34B5F88069A2@apache.org> <3EEE8B55-C689-4AC0-96E1-4BFFFC6B95FE@apache.org> <23DA50BE-2D95-48E2-B0FD-95234B544E40@apache.org> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1082) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 26 Jan 2011, at 13:03, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > In this case I don't care much if we record any of this (no objections = either). What I am after is that the fact that for reliable storage on = Windows Erlang R14B1 is required for 1.0.2 should be noted in a place = where people downloading or reading up on 1.0.2 are looking (i.e. the = release announcement mail, which gets syndicated to many news sites as = well as the download page, where, duh, the download happens). Sure. But I'm just trying to clarify how we handle this, so that we can = apply it to future releases as well. If there's been a minimum required = version in the past, we usually put it in the README. We have never, to date, included any minimum version information in = either the release announcement or on the downloads page. If the = community feels that this is important enough in this case to warrant = breaking with that convention, then so be it. But I'm trying to get a handle on when this is likely to happen again, = so that we can ratify it in our release procedure.=