Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Subject: Re: suppoted platforms check of couchdb 1.0.2?
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1082)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252
From: Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTikAjdmca9CKSE8K8r7SFmzk1NYkZh41cE2n=hGi@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 22 Jan 2011 17:46:25 +0000
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <46AE98B6-0EFE-4855-AE3A-0E5D1A2164B8@apache.org>
References: <AANLkTikAjdmca9CKSE8K8r7SFmzk1NYkZh41cE2n=hGi@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org

There is no officially supported platform at the moment. Although it's =
important to stress that every release we've ever made has been tested =
on both Ubuntu/Debian and Mac OS X.=20

Those should be two (three?) should be considered the de-facto platform. =
CouchDB does, however, run in many other places. We've had patches for =
Solarix, for example =97 and we apply them as and when they come in.

Our Windows support is still in testing, and until we have a full time =
RM who can test and co-ordinate with the release team, it will remain =
that way.

On 22 Jan 2011, at 10:53, Jeroen Janssen wrote:

> Hi,
>=20
> Seeing that the vote for couchdb 1.0.2 is ongoing at the moment (and
> related to me being a win32 user of couchdb), I was wondering who will
> check couchdb 1.0.2 building correctly on the win32 platform?
>=20
> More general: is there a list of all the 'official' supported
> platforms for couchdb and are they all tested as part of the voting
> process?
> Or is that done after the actual release by the downstream packagers
> with the (small) chance that something does not build correctly on a
> certain platform?
>=20
> Anyway, I also wanted to thank you for all the hard work you have been
> doing and I am really impressed by the quality standards.
>=20
> Best regards,
>=20
> Jeroen