Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of fdmanana@gmail.com designates
 209.85.161.52 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:date:x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject
         :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ejdHWR6UvzOyfhnb5COTV4X3TkcXTM7zCy8Cs+gAwp7zTXQb35SUl4D0PNOAOf+T3e
         kuVzBgugyUTMr5e3ZvIBgjIBuTD7RCS0MFqS5ZV1SNGnuMlUJhZZdCu6yOFziFfU7V8k
         3fl3PMc684NKv7SJff1DNvmnj/sXDDMO+LZjY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: fdmanana@gmail.com
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2010 20:13:34 +0000
Message-ID: <AANLkTimQ3_NHGV8DqEYvLijV8y_-jtkifGKXYicEESk3@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Remove 0.9 upgrade code?
From: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@apache.org>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello all,

While doing an experiment, I started removing all the 0.9 file format
upgrade code. This significantly reduces the amount of code we have:

https://github.com/fdmanana/couchdb/commit/ab910576ae7bdfb852971aed17a7a911=
50de651d

(please ignore a few other minor changes done in that diff)

Do we still need this code? 0.9 is really old, and since we are close
to release 1.1, I'm not sure if it makes sense to keep that upgrade
code.
Haven't tested, but I heard a few times from friends that opening with
1.0.1 a DB file created with 0.10 didn't work properly (therefore
likely to not work as well with a 0.9 file).

regards,


--=20
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org

"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
=C2=A0Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
=C2=A0That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."