From dev-return-13916-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Mon Dec 27 00:24:01 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 2744 invoked from network); 27 Dec 2010 00:24:00 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 27 Dec 2010 00:24:00 -0000 Received: (qmail 14889 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2010 00:24:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 14846 invoked by uid 500); 27 Dec 2010 00:24:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 14838 invoked by uid 99); 27 Dec 2010 00:24:00 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:24:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.210.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.210.180] (HELO mail-iy0-f180.google.com) (209.85.210.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 27 Dec 2010 00:23:53 +0000 Received: by iyi12 with SMTP id 12so7763722iyi.11 for ; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:23:33 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=9ktJ61pUMhbTZ2flLL+hnQsCXv+90WdcELLN4NrbPq8=; b=kGzAhbemHnRURuSF9SMou38QwBZcQ+zUySxP3C/BmazO6K6d1jkmhtfFZ/kZpr+A7+ o3E/FPYJwJz9XvVknOoJ+lnGThckfDgPovV+CBV2PaoQPRNL15bokGa5DAJQI+TiC98K KqZcY2eFpxanASpylk444wrOKMe7BfIS/mnYU= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=Z8cAB9eevTZuBzn0QbkOe0Wb09Ep46x9E2UvZB0mXFOYeAgpCfa7ovbPJ9Q27Sa+dN Z/hocxeBUuM2d9AzYpHFhL0jXcKYzWzxHuE4GvtQ/KaqhBkrBX0W1XuoMwhUX+pLsxL1 bnk/LloWZvQ8sXOEcTw4/d+r77v32pW423n0k= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.37.197 with SMTP id y5mr11388281ibd.180.1293409413212; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:23:33 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.205.130 with HTTP; Sun, 26 Dec 2010 16:23:33 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: Date: Mon, 27 Dec 2010 01:23:33 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: Source tree refactoring - TESTERS NEEDED From: Benoit Chesneau To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On Mon, Dec 27, 2010 at 12:53 AM, Paul Davis wrote: > > Its not being done in trunk. The change is being prepared as a script > and set of patches that people can test independently which people > have been doing. > Not what I say. Was about testing it first in it's own branch. But right patches are enough. Just actually i'm not sure how i can edit one or go further ? Another patch ? What's your process to make such patches at first ? stashes ? > I reckon it'll be handled exactly the same as any of the Java projects > that contain multiple packages, as in, absolutely nothing changes. > mmm, but if we use rebar, how can we tell him to go for x packages. If we consider, each package could be replaced separatly on custom distributions ? - beno=EEt