Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95560 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2010 11:09:12 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Nov 2010 11:09:12 -0000 Received: (qmail 75777 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 11:09:12 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 75513 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 11:09:11 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 75505 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2010 11:09:11 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:09:11 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.180 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.180] (HELO mail-iw0-f180.google.com) (209.85.214.180) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 11:09:06 +0000 Received: by iwn37 with SMTP id 37so2260543iwn.11 for ; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 03:08:46 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=5OV2pNt53jbLcQDpRpEPDtCeqkyYPtiaxaWNI2MQjVA=; b=aYuc43qK3Oh50fYgbBygsj53UVVlG30U4TaFwqDNozgDUl63c825MJZOO8DbfnPv8z ewbkYYdKP2i9F8SHdjyhRSuRsDRiUrdFrckhOWO/470R9PPOJulsek3rU8na8wHCkzCF egONJbAAiiK6mL28X6Qe+THclHDmdtHCqOC/c= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=xAers0C34jjWUCAHwM5foJnr6k31XuP1BILazOn9isnAgEIM0NxilNcASFZziELnBs 99UIpN+Zp70Z6HcmQ5dzBurpLrqeRU9HaLe7EMh6zyG5rX++MNDde2oJFvb0SIBSy6CC iL2Sb+/In6p/dCXcxjSJtQhvl24bQkE6MuBSo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.59.12 with SMTP id j12mr1369987ibh.11.1290769725046; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 03:08:45 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.231.50.70 with HTTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 03:08:44 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <04335370-BB92-453D-AD53-FA16306FC703@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 12:08:44 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 release, Round 1 From: Benoit Chesneau To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:59 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: > 2010/11/26 Benoit Chesneau : >> On Fri, Nov 26, 2010 at 11:30 AM, Peter Lemenkov wrote: >> >>> Unfortunately, right now CouchDB's own copy of mochiweb misses many >>> bugfixes already available in upstream. So it's worth to rebase >>> couchdb on top of recently released 1.4.1 rather than trying to find >>> something valuable in src/mochiweb. > >> Can you open a ticket about that an deventually list "important" bits >> we missed ? That could help :) > > I don't see any point in duplicating upstream bug-tracker, so you may > take a look right there: > > https://github.com/mochi/mochiweb/issues/closed > Sorry but you made statements we should rebase against another version because of change in upstream mohiweb. So if you consider there is an issue in couchdb,that need to be fixed let us know. We already imported some changes in our code base: https://github.com/apache/couchdb/tree/trunk/src/mochiweb/ Some other changes in latest mochiweb aren't only fixes. 1.0.2 is a release for fixes as far as I can tell. 1.1 is another deal. - benoit