From dev-return-13458-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Fri Nov 26 06:14:43 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 95572 invoked from network); 26 Nov 2010 06:14:42 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 26 Nov 2010 06:14:42 -0000 Received: (qmail 44318 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 06:14:42 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 44127 invoked by uid 500); 26 Nov 2010 06:14:41 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 44118 invoked by uid 99); 26 Nov 2010 06:14:41 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:14:41 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of lemenkov@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.52] (HELO mail-bw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.214.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 26 Nov 2010 06:14:34 +0000 Received: by bwz4 with SMTP id 4so1516084bwz.11 for ; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:14:13 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=lXdyyBKa8YOHLRK/R9y5VdgLEs7iNIgcE3e8YtIs5i0=; b=fm1nQLd5aPSErUJWjkQJqBs/+Wk6dDVCNfHRtiTG9HQwz+tHNYxmtPDs6eIfMTbuP8 gdsjINB3Sk+jJ5P9n0qjv4Sx2QU3cCjuexuysQKXcVQDQs2HKIm5HSsGpj7LIwEopq1/ J1jWsWJnJgSfDtyYFOe4sBxoIgoZydV0ptWBE= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=iol2ErlFhjPfEwDCMxmqGGk1HYMK60LxwnAAbAV0bDiLoF7fNsVOJ7KNkzK/TX8xVu sBRakxUBcNwhg0K1ePkaFr+F6JlO/P1NKTWF3mB+wLKzpQju6ojdxmY/f1DdjsVF+2/e P7+QlRrVGHTKWIUsfItSYUg7VH4ctEN/16MaA= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.117.12 with SMTP id o12mr124490bkq.166.1290752053089; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:14:13 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.204.116.148 with HTTP; Thu, 25 Nov 2010 22:14:13 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: References: <04335370-BB92-453D-AD53-FA16306FC703@googlemail.com> Date: Fri, 26 Nov 2010 09:14:13 +0300 Message-ID: Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.2 release, Round 1 From: Peter Lemenkov To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 2010/11/26 Robert Newson : > pretty sure ibrowse and mochiweb have important tweaks, using versions > without them is broken. I'm not sure about mochiweb (since couchdb contains very old svn snapshot, and it's hard to check for the differences) but regarding ibrowse - couchdb is only 1 patch behind the 2.1.0. I'll plan to backport in into 2.1.0 shipped in Fedora. So a) These libraries are not so different from upstream ones (at least true for ibrowse) b) CouchDB in Fedora isn't so deadly broken as someone of you may think In fact I'm watching very closely the development of both ibrowse and mochiweb so I'm aware of the changes made or just proposed by CouchDB folks. -- With best regards, Peter Lemenkov.