couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Dirkjan Ochtman <>
Subject Re: Versioning
Date Thu, 04 Nov 2010 15:16:11 GMT
On Thu, Nov 4, 2010 at 13:17, Jan Lehnardt <> wrote:
> Now my question is if that's a good enough way to version
> things. How e.g. would upgrades to the CouchDBX shell be
> denoted?
> Is the extra number confusing? Is any other scheme confusing?
> Is the matching CouchDB release numbers important enough to
> keep?

The extra number seems in line with what other places do, so it seems
alright. I suspect you would handle upgrades to the CouchDBX shell,
the same way, e.g. by increasing the extra version identifier.

FWIW Gentoo uses -r1 instead of -1 which I like a tiny little bit
better, but it's basically a wash.



View raw message