Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of norman.barker@gmail.com
 designates 74.125.82.54 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type;
        b=L+DlxX4/1cunURrvZ3lbHtbeFm26HkZ9lEWI8/TWiVOWqriYKcmsen28rWF1Zvhhjw
         wbPMSslZaHUlEUhuejlGJzmdL7TEWK6q45MTCzg7AqQ0DrUnaWJprEeqyK8ZxetWG25+
         OCD6HwCQwlfgD9Kv9cX/ZMViGNaKlhiy+JHW4=
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <15E0687F-B477-4C7D-BFDA-A46DAE2408E4@apache.org>
References: <AANLkTi==GqB9SKuphKJ69OucqjpUrX2m4x1wjfmrgt9N@mail.gmail.com>
	<5395F3E1-DF2F-41F8-B2E2-FE4AE925B8CA@apache.org>
	<AANLkTik=bvdY14UgoL-2BNz2djqYQSiB8a2tvDdkXCec@mail.gmail.com>
	<B9782AA0-59CE-4A4F-937F-A3771CF3647C@apache.org>
	<AANLkTikhJryufzUO_NNghL17UMVu+CGnyBWQsD1X+QOb@mail.gmail.com>
	<15E0687F-B477-4C7D-BFDA-A46DAE2408E4@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 16:47:45 -0600
Message-ID: <AANLkTimZ6n_Cmm=eVT2zXsCoApbUujSoFa8DRgSNMtZu@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: CouchDB 1.1
From: Norman Barker <norman.barker@gmail.com>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1

As far as native fti, then clucene has a few issues but they are
surmountable. I have been keeping a close eye on Apache Lucy
(KinoSearch) and I think this is a good candidate for CouchDB.

As for other options for 1.2, I am available to help get the multiview
in to the trunk, lots of users seem interested but I have had little
dev (thanks Chris, Robert and Volke though) input.

Norman

On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 4:42 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
> I'm tired... It's almost midnight! :p
>
> On 15 Sep 2010, at 23:41, Robert Newson wrote:
>
>> Seriously... ;)
>>
>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Oh, crap. My bad! Haha. I was thinking 1.0.2!
>>>
>>> Of all people to get this wrong...
>>>
>>> On 15 Sep 2010, at 23:29, Robert Newson wrote:
>>>
>>>> why 1.2?
>>>>
>>>> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org> wrote:
>>>>> Shouldn't this be 1.2?
>>>>>
>>>>> On 15 Sep 2010, at 21:51, Robert Newson wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> All,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I figured I'd start the thread as I have some cool stuff in trunk that
>>>>>> I'd like to see in a release one of these days.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What should be in 1.1? When should we release it?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> FYI: I've added three things I think are important for 1.1;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) support for the Range header for uncompressed attachments.
>>>>>> 2) HTTPS support for the couchdb daemon.
>>>>>> 3) _sum now supports an array of numbers.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I believe there's at least one important fix needed for 1.1;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1) The replicator allows ssl connections to hosts with self-signed
>>>>>> certificates by default, obviating the security of the protocol. Since
>>>>>> this is the OTP default (seriously), we probably want to get a patch
>>>>>> upstream as well.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> B.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>>>
>
>