Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 11881 invoked from network); 15 Sep 2010 22:41:56 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 15 Sep 2010 22:41:56 -0000 Received: (qmail 11375 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2010 22:41:55 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 11310 invoked by uid 500); 15 Sep 2010 22:41:55 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 11302 invoked by uid 99); 15 Sep 2010 22:41:55 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:41:55 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of robert.newson@gmail.com designates 209.85.216.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.216.52] (HELO mail-qw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.216.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 22:41:48 +0000 Received: by qwf6 with SMTP id 6so771120qwf.11 for ; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:41:28 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=MoSubVnQ1B6PvJDZRi8fB45+iG4MthNtBWeBhH1g6pI=; b=uW/XMEmPYToMpU4GHiHX+Wg1ybq+HdQBiD43iLnW1nQHxWZViope8vAOPqufwND4QQ P0cw63alWH6qurOoiqLMZwSwXt7f4yj+Yv4A0805bFrMgv5r/aivvjlOYYDXNBByjHg2 gSRR5aG388o27RD06v75Q+HoD0/Myro+syZvw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=rVURsM3hK5q6u3meLL5mmHnMlheG0Vnr9QdaD96Rm1DlOLkyc2Fp3rPwi86578p4GN bX84e/t24O9JFDAmdRU1qKJlCW8NLcj8TJxcKYG427m0Alw6KDly+UHc/QmuphjxADIA bwOnX1iVv4lW9RKmPMy98S/+Ih2adMJDKtQWo= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.229.250.193 with SMTP id mp1mr1643450qcb.129.1284590487972; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:41:27 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.229.51.200 with HTTP; Wed, 15 Sep 2010 15:41:27 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: References: <5395F3E1-DF2F-41F8-B2E2-FE4AE925B8CA@apache.org> Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2010 23:41:27 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: CouchDB 1.1 From: Robert Newson To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Seriously... ;) On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:31 PM, Noah Slater wrote: > Oh, crap. My bad! Haha. I was thinking 1.0.2! > > Of all people to get this wrong... > > On 15 Sep 2010, at 23:29, Robert Newson wrote: > >> why 1.2? >> >> On Wed, Sep 15, 2010 at 11:27 PM, Noah Slater wrote: >>> Shouldn't this be 1.2? >>> >>> On 15 Sep 2010, at 21:51, Robert Newson wrote: >>> >>>> All, >>>> >>>> I figured I'd start the thread as I have some cool stuff in trunk that >>>> I'd like to see in a release one of these days. >>>> >>>> What should be in 1.1? When should we release it? >>>> >>>> FYI: I've added three things I think are important for 1.1; >>>> >>>> 1) support for the Range header for uncompressed attachments. >>>> 2) HTTPS support for the couchdb daemon. >>>> 3) _sum now supports an array of numbers. >>>> >>>> I believe there's at least one important fix needed for 1.1; >>>> >>>> 1) The replicator allows ssl connections to hosts with self-signed >>>> certificates by default, obviating the security of the protocol. Since >>>> this is the OTP default (seriously), we probably want to get a patch >>>> upstream as well. >>>> >>>> B. >>> >>> > >