Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081)
Subject: Re: RFC: Releasing 1.0.1
From: Jan Lehnardt <jan@apache.org>
In-Reply-To: <2B6E17BE-0ECA-4901-A3FA-5F8F88DBF8DB@apache.org>
Date: Wed, 4 Aug 2010 00:10:05 +0200
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F0C96A5D-09F3-44A8-8FC7-B81A9AD15BC2@apache.org>
References: <917133A8-7174-4245-92F3-6D65C6904C87@apache.org>
 <C43196CF-7958-4391-AC08-F75B8B32E73E@apache.org>
 <AANLkTim+g5qfM5dA275_nO+mA3mG93LWHFe7xfPPuEX9@mail.gmail.com>
 <AANLkTim19xQSrt+FbdtnhFFOo=GywFiOQ5qY1GiFfuUV@mail.gmail.com>
 <62A06786-3199-4889-8BB0-D543F21CE715@apache.org>
 <AANLkTi=CLty+0c2oztEinkvdYsHtCD8MGUHUbBQdbz3B@mail.gmail.com>
 <6AF06E19-7B74-4881-864D-D59BFC9835D1@gmail.com>
 <AANLkTik+BokToVCvdG_+kxRDTge9X4DQqRixgi2U8+O8@mail.gmail.com>
 <82D65CA6-40AF-431B-9242-4CAC08CAE8B0@apache.org>
 <AE023B0A-4066-4D46-8EF1-B48D5610430D@apache.org>
 <2B6E17BE-0ECA-4901-A3FA-5F8F88DBF8DB@apache.org>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org


On 3 Aug 2010, at 20:46, J Chris Anderson wrote:

>=20
> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:16 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>=20
>>=20
>> On Jul 31, 2010, at 6:09 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>=20
>>> I saw a conversation on IRC tonight about bumping this thread. I =
noticed an email from J. Chris in another thread saying he wanted to =
hold back from 1.0.1 until something was fixed. Waiting for the all =
clear. Let me know.
>>=20
>>=20
>> All clear! I don't remember suggesting we should wait, but I'll take =
your word for it.
>>=20
>=20
> Did I say all clear? Whoops! ;)
>=20
> It's come to my attention that this commit would like to be backported =
to 1.0.1, despite not meeting the procedural requirements for =
backporting. (it's a new feature)
>=20
> http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?revision=3D980985&view=3Drevision
>=20
> "Add support for replication through an HTTP/HTTPS proxy."
>=20
> The reason is that our releases are a leaky abstraction, and Ubuntu =
will be freezing to a CouchDB release for their next release in a few =
days.
>=20
> Since Ubuntu is our largest install base, and they would love to be =
able to offer sync to users behind proxies, I am +1 on bending the rules =
for them.
>=20
> The patch itself is not technically risky, as it has no effect unless =
the user provides the new replicator option, so the chance of =
introducing bugs is very small.
>=20
> I am backporting this now, but of course I am open to discussion. The =
preemptive backport is meant to ensure that we don't forget to discuss =
this. If anyone is -1 on the idea, please let us know, so that we can =
find common ground.

No objections, the patch is good and simple.

Cheers
Jan
--=20


>=20
> Chris
>=20
>=20
>> I definitely reverted and redid one of the patches that I backported =
to 1.0.x, but that's all cleaned up now.
>>=20
>> I think we are in the clear. Plus I'm excited to start working on =
1.0.2.
>>=20
>> We should also roll 0.11.3 at this time.
>>=20
>> Chris
>=20