Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fdmanana@gmail.com designates
 209.85.213.52 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:sender:in-reply-to:references:date
         :x-google-sender-auth:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=j1k5iWXHUh6BsyJizYewvIo1diB2aVLj6m5GYZtxCnFnO+YCBhHCOTTTF6vWHUSSVl
         Ck7D2OPUi9A3YvM5M57JCPcJGjxUDCJl4i97wB8DnSKXJxBTL4p06DTCm2nMU+seOYir
         8dvLmyGNPtbsOEb+6oHNmoWMg9iYck+rTcMhY=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Sender: fdmanana@gmail.com
In-Reply-To: <AANLkTimLBeBZJ+No2W=K58d8YR1eeu6KOq5ajAL3Qf8C@mail.gmail.com>
References: <AANLkTimLBeBZJ+No2W=K58d8YR1eeu6KOq5ajAL3Qf8C@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Aug 2010 17:29:27 +0100
Message-ID: <AANLkTi=SXCr9nZWQZOpGCf4Q-nRB=FU4T-9KjODiNQs7@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: request.sec or request.secObj ?
From: Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@apache.org>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174c36b2c5f64e048e1b91d7

--0015174c36b2c5f64e048e1b91d7
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

secObj as well

On Wed, Aug 18, 2010 at 5:26 PM, Benoit Chesneau <bchesneau@gmail.com>wrote:

> Hi all,
>
> I want to expose the security object to shows, lists, updates and
> validate function, so we could eventually add some metadata to a db
> (idea come from jcrhis@) . It's relatively easy but I hesitate about
> the variable name . My preferece go for secObj (like we have userCtx).
> What do you think ?
>
> - benoit
>


-- 
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com, fdmanana@apache.org

"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
 Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
 That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."

--0015174c36b2c5f64e048e1b91d7--