couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Paul Davis <paul.joseph.da...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: Proposal for changes in view server/protocol
Date Mon, 02 Aug 2010 20:00:51 GMT
On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 7:24 AM, Jason Smith <jhs@couch.io> wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 2, 2010 at 18:02, Filipe David Manana <fdmanana@apache.org>wrote:
>
>> +1 on BenoƮt's comment.
>>
>> Using erlang_js, emonk or something equivalent should be top priority
>>
>
> I love this idea however as I am responsible for thousands of unrelated
> users' couches, I want significant assurance about the security and
> sandboxing of a new view server runtime.
>

Just a quick point, but running things through emonk would actually
provide a more secure sandbox than the current model. All I have left
to make emonk a viable alternative to couchjs is to finish up the
async request processing so schedulers aren't blocked.

> In other words, can CouchDB fix a few bugs in the 1.x branch while working
> on major improvements in 2.x?
>
> Specifically, the bug I cited is something so simple, so stupid, that
> CouchDB cannot process HTML form input. In this context, I do not care how
> impressive the back-end is. I just want good tools for web developers to
> use. I would definitely be frustrated to find myself on the API change
> treadmill.
>
> --
> Jason Smith
> Couchio Hosting
>

Mime
View raw message