couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Miles Fidelman <mfidel...@meetinghouse.net>
Subject Re: why erlang?
Date Mon, 16 Aug 2010 18:22:26 GMT
Randall,

Thanks for the quick answer.
> Couch absolutely takes advantage of things like supervisor trees and process
> spawning. Handling each client in a separate process is not something only
> done in erlang, but erlang makes it easier. The supervisor trees and pattern
> mattern matching make error handling pretty nice, ensuring that errors
> bubble up appropriately so proper return codes can reach the client.
>
> In the future, I suspect we'll see even more as clustering features start to
> work their way into core couchdb.
>
> Anything else in particular you had in mind?
>    
I guess I'm just a little surprised that the replication features seem 
to be independent of Erlang's underlying inter-node communications 
capabilities.  Seems like the clustering features would have been an 
obvious place to start for high-reliability operations.

Miles

-- 
In theory, there is no difference between theory and practice.
In<fnord>  practice, there is.   .... Yogi Berra



Mime
View raw message