Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 33876 invoked from network); 7 Jul 2010 15:37:05 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 7 Jul 2010 15:37:05 -0000 Received: (qmail 45855 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 15:37:05 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 45805 invoked by uid 500); 7 Jul 2010 15:37:04 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 45797 invoked by uid 99); 7 Jul 2010 15:37:04 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:37:04 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests=FREEMAIL_FROM,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of bchesneau@gmail.com designates 209.85.215.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.215.52] (HELO mail-ew0-f52.google.com) (209.85.215.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 15:36:56 +0000 Received: by ewy20 with SMTP id 20so3304614ewy.11 for ; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:35:47 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:in-reply-to :references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8TBp1nJy4pxrG6BfbeOMYgNE+OS7P+prrLjIALq+gfw=; b=JAoUc4Uv5Um8MqcXwUGYZcX3qJ+a/Deh8XgbPGlfQ+PU0aX9rtdqNmhlw/FqwlByRO mOcFwrykmIxHneTkqH3cF6Wlinvg5tLeMhKWZP5GmLpQzuNA+MyC5bTdAzjO1ubk2A+y s+SYFdFTZeDfMRthdIvly05ccE/Y8T2/joywA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=uCWrPf4xnyUCneWbSyP6IVUCP8rrJd9Y4IzsvzCBHE732ECl37HlaaoO+dwIZQpkcF PNKOjOKit54RjQyhxmk7YC2fECyHj92P5s+g3V2wpPwwMBq0cjUL26vsme67923M8jnH Qriw7f3ucTHY4C9JWbk1mTs8HeNmAXETe1KCU= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.213.28.130 with SMTP id m2mr4127268ebc.21.1278516947102; Wed, 07 Jul 2010 08:35:47 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.14.127.129 with HTTP; Wed, 7 Jul 2010 08:35:47 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <5B386043-C5A0-4E96-8F55-4BA2E8ECD1B7@apache.org> References: <4C31FF1A.30002@gmail.com> <4C33B24E.8050109@gmail.com> <4C33B509.5070403@gmail.com> <904E26BC-C97D-45DC-B61B-0444795430BF@gmail.com> <321567ED-2CBE-4ECF-9234-C5DEDDCEFA83@apache.org> <5B386043-C5A0-4E96-8F55-4BA2E8ECD1B7@apache.org> Date: Wed, 7 Jul 2010 17:35:47 +0200 Message-ID: Subject: Re: delayed_commits false From: Benoit Chesneau To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Wed, Jul 7, 2010 at 2:29 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: >> Anyway rereading the doc we provide, I think delayed_commit don't >> break the promise since db is always in consistent state. > > "consistent state" means CouchDB can start up and use that db > without andy fixup phase (c.f myisamchk, or InnoDB log-replay). > yes, that why I'm ok with the promise :) - benoit