Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 4742 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 21:52:10 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 21:52:10 -0000 Received: (qmail 72020 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 21:52:10 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 71819 invoked by uid 500); 1 Jul 2010 21:52:09 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 71781 invoked by uid 99); 1 Jul 2010 21:52:09 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:52:09 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.68.5.9] (HELO relay00.pair.com) (209.68.5.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Thu, 01 Jul 2010 21:52:01 +0000 Received: (qmail 33479 invoked from network); 1 Jul 2010 21:51:39 -0000 Received: from 74.1.186.35 (HELO ?10.0.1.205?) (74.1.186.35) by relay00.pair.com with SMTP; 1 Jul 2010 21:51:39 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 74.1.186.35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Subject: Re: write performance on trunk From: Damien Katz In-Reply-To: Date: Thu, 1 Jul 2010 14:51:39 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <26539173-9C8F-4364-A5A8-A5627441AE8E@apache.org> References: To: dev@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Awesome! I think most of this is due to Adam and Randall. Nice work guys = :) -Damien On Jul 1, 2010, at 2:48 PM, Mikeal Rogers wrote: > I don't know what we did, but in my tests the write performance on = trunk is > about 3x faster than 0.11 >=20 > = http://mikeal.couchone.com/graphs/_design/app/_show/compareWriteReadTest/e= 69057a29bd6e4ac4ae0115fac018487 >=20 > The left vertical column is the average response time in ms and the = bottom > horizontal line is the duration in seconds. >=20 > This is comparing 50 writers and 200 readers using large document. I'm = also > going to run the test with small documents to see how big the = difference is. > Both are running with delayed_commits =3D false ; >=20 > -Mikeal