couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jarrod Roberson <jar...@vertigrated.com>
Subject Re: [ANNOUNCE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 has been released
Date Thu, 15 Jul 2010 17:32:34 GMT
Did this issue ( https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-749 ) get
resolved in 1.0?
Personally it is a real show stopper, there is a work around ( store all
largish numbers as strings ), but it is serious.
If not it needs to be documented if not, it bit me and only my unit tests
caught it.

All the following operations exhibit the same bug, large numbers don't get
persisted correctly. They get something added to them for some reason.
9223372036854775807 == java.lang.Long.MAX_VALUE

1: go into Futon, create a new document and create a new field and enter the
number 9223372036854775807, click the green check mark, the number changes
to 9223372036854776000 even before you save it.

2.curl -X PUT http://localhost:5984/test/longTest -d '{"value":
9223372036854775807}', the number gets persisted as 9223372036854776000

trying to persist System.currentTimeMilliseconds() from java causes the same
thing to happen occasionally.

This seems to be a pretty serious bug if I can't trust that my data is not
being corrupted when submitted to the database.

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message