couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Jason Smith (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-837) Adding stale=partial
Date Tue, 27 Jul 2010 16:05:16 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-837?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12892827#action_12892827
] 

Jason Smith commented on COUCHDB-837:
-------------------------------------

stale=relaxed was tongue in cheek. I'm not a fan either.

As long as we are bikeshedding, stale=ok is itself inferior to stale=true. Doubless `ok` is
an Erlang-ism that leaked out into the HTTP API. Why is it include_docs=true but not stale=true?

(No reply necessary, just airing my grievances.)

> Adding stale=partial
> --------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-837
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-837
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>         Environment: all released and unreleased versions
>            Reporter: Filipe Manana
>            Assignee: Filipe Manana
>         Attachments: stale_partial.patch
>
>
> Inspired by Matthias' latest post, at http://www.paperplanes.de/2010/7/26/10_annoying_things_about_couchdb.html,
section "Views are updated on read access", I added a new value to the "stale" option named
"partial" (possibly we need to find a better name).
> It behaves exactly like "stale=ok" but after replying to the client, it triggers a view
update in the background.
> Patch attached.
> If no one disagrees this isn't a good feature, or suggest a better parameter value name,
I'll commit.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message