Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 66832 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2010 19:43:50 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Jun 2010 19:43:50 -0000 Received: (qmail 59624 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2010 19:43:50 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 59588 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2010 19:43:50 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 59580 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2010 19:43:50 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:43:50 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jchris@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.52] (HELO mail-pw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.160.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:43:42 +0000 Received: by pwj4 with SMTP id 4so486304pwj.11 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:43:22 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:content-type:mime-version :subject:from:in-reply-to:date:content-transfer-encoding:message-id :references:to:x-mailer; bh=Yi3uNUv+HJPnZNT6/hilVmATVOqj/VTvR4jWQC0ZLAQ=; b=haE5eBvtaxQTUnVr++mcQ7hYH7kN60Q2/Q8Ib4TyDxsS0dRKolNzTk3jWCviT7Z0Ay xwDjnYk6TTl49of2Os4PD1T9aTFQY6vd8Ga1iDOTUvRTj0Jw2E57C94uoMj0jlQdAQYs psSKiZwzoz6//knhXHLbJYKT8b7L1L2PvLkps= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer; b=MQMpRVFyrd/2I98tVoTTITVoxtjzO33xhq+a4iGdwtlT85PUV4jyGQtK0JcyINg+5K lhdyAcoO/pDCXvfWzx4WHSBnQ3gjmX48rrAQr+CPRQci9wJWZqT1/cgKo5pbB9fX91si 2MpE7IoD8RzEy2vUYwSnzsQfJtASOwJ4WIZXg= Received: by 10.142.74.10 with SMTP id w10mr1568426wfa.118.1277495002035; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:43:22 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.1.108] (c-98-248-172-14.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [98.248.172.14]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l10sm553889rvh.21.2010.06.25.12.43.20 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:43:21 -0700 (PDT) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Subject: Re: 1.0 Vote From: J Chris Anderson In-Reply-To: Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:43:19 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: <06785380-0D82-431A-9DF0-FFBCF019C4F5@apache.org> <7A2714AB-13AF-4E65-A51F-CA58467B97E6@tumbolia.org> <9CF6D94D-D1CF-48A8-AFD8-903CC8D13735@apache.org> <02AD8968-F757-4FBA-8E77-900673E6C0DD@tumbolia.org> <523C3F77-8922-4F16-B467-9C659C00CE46@apache.org> <3AAF584E-59F0-4F12-965E-12686F51ECCE@tumbolia.org> <00A52656-15F1-4837-8406-C860B01C08BD@tumbolia.org> <54D13C7E-2F1A-48F0-BAEA-2359FF8EB3E1@mac.com> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) On Jun 25, 2010, at 12:35 PM, Randall Leeds wrote: > Thanks for the clarifications, Jan. > All makes sense now. 0.11.x has to continue to exist and be fulfill > its "stated use". > New features should be reverted out of there. >=20 Sounds good to me, but I'm not sure about what's worth removing from = 0.11.x and what isn't. I suppose if anything would be an impediment to a = smooth upgrade for a 0.11 user, it should be backed out. As I recall most of the stuff in 0.11.x isn't new features (maybe some = feature refinements) so unless it could mess up someone's day, I don't = think it's crucial to un-backport it. > Yeah. We're in agreement. Chris=