Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 44565 invoked from network); 24 Jun 2010 20:15:03 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 24 Jun 2010 20:15:03 -0000 Received: (qmail 3106 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2010 20:15:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 2906 invoked by uid 500); 24 Jun 2010 20:15:02 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 2897 invoked by uid 99); 24 Jun 2010 20:15:02 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:15:02 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=2.8 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,HTML_MESSAGE,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of fdmanana@gmail.com designates 209.85.214.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.214.52] (HELO mail-bw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.214.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 20:14:55 +0000 Received: by bwz16 with SMTP id 16so4711851bwz.11 for ; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:14:34 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:received:reply-to :in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=SxkOpAjcvM2WW2eoEsbmMQBAppfMiF/VA5NQvuMJuKY=; b=Jnq/vXv0tn32pniZwVWNgRPrUkoPanyGwnp8rgtLGyv/iJ5nKdEL4iw2MFHUiQGCX2 wGMdRH34SgltdmHiEt+ijfezEjA3gA3EFvgzckfG48NMOaAVmZf8npi6ugLks1hANZRP Hxlhqkqgv5IdT9uVkKFVnMQgRhvm/1lAJAbdQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:reply-to:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id :subject:from:to:content-type; b=oGn2Kv/gPTksP/RILMbJtrmux7RsPthCTr2wG8ykSpo7BLzgPKmFUlIap8/7m7Vyrg z/4AlVIgYLt9JoPZCKMb7pxVGcnnVd1LTkJCv4OHyD0JODEgkKAncdiig/AnIdSXQGPP 932EYFexKrQVt35RS3SmUarCl2OC93nQsIjZs= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.204.8.5 with SMTP id f5mr6803932bkf.209.1277410474289; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.204.67.72 with HTTP; Thu, 24 Jun 2010 13:14:34 -0700 (PDT) Reply-To: fdmanana@gmail.com In-Reply-To: <8B72F7D4-7B6A-4E57-8DCB-C2ACFD35313E@apache.org> References: <103BF86B-6730-4A1D-BB14-B3C8D8045FEB@googlemail.com> <16BE4728-A612-45A6-A374-811003E29DEF@apache.org> <918AF697-2940-4183-8B34-097FD215A210@googlemail.com> <8B72F7D4-7B6A-4E57-8DCB-C2ACFD35313E@apache.org> Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2010 21:14:34 +0100 Message-ID: Subject: Re: users_db failing on trunk (0.12.0a5e852dd-git) From: Filipe David Manana To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=0015174bdd3a8d6ab60489cc4d9f --0015174bdd3a8d6ab60489cc4d9f Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Explained in the last comments of https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-807 cheers On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 8:21 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > On 24 Jun 2010, at 21:09, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: > > > ah okay, must have missed that commit where you reenabled this test. > sorry for the noise! > > No, no, this isn't noise, there is an issue here and you > made us aware of it, so thanks :) > > There is a failing test here which means we either introduced > a regression or the test is faulty and we gotta find out what's > what and get a fix in place. > > Cheers > Jan > -- > > > > > On 24.06.2010, at 20:54, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > > > >> Hi, > >> > >> On 24 Jun 2010, at 19:33, Sebastian Cohnen wrote: > >> > >>> hey devs, > >>> > >>> just wanted you to know that user_db is failing for me on trunk. I did > >>> > >>> git pull && make clean && make distclean && ./bootstrap && ./configure > && make check && make dev > >>> > >>> make check passes, but the users_db test is failing every single time > (triggered separately or not does not matter): > >>> > >>> Assertion failed: e.error == "unauthorized" > >>> Assertion failed: /conflict/.test(e.reason) > >> > >> Just some context. The test file has been missing from the list of tests > for a while > >> so the actual regression (if there is any, the test might just be > wrong), could have > >> happened some time in the past. > >> > >> I re-enabled the test a few days ago. > >> > >> Cheers > >> Jan > >> -- > >> > >> > > > > -- Filipe David Manana, fdmanana@gmail.com "Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world. Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves. That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men." --0015174bdd3a8d6ab60489cc4d9f--