Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Message-ID: <33157812.134041275494743862.JavaMail.jira@thor>
Date: Wed, 2 Jun 2010 12:05:43 -0400 (EDT)
From: "Till Klampaeckel (JIRA)" <jira@apache.org>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Subject: [jira] Updated: (COUCHDB-782) Restarting replication
In-Reply-To: <5653579.133941275494617759.JavaMail.jira@thor>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit


     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-782?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Till Klampaeckel updated COUCHDB-782:
-------------------------------------

    Description: 
So we had to restart replication on a server and here's something I noticed.

At first I restarted the replication via the following command from localhost:

curl -X POST -d '{"source":"http://localhost:5984/foo", "target":"http://remote:5984/foo"}' http://localhost:5984/_replicate

In response, futon stats:
W Processed source update #176841152

That part is great.

Last night I did not have immediate access to the shell so I restarted replication from remote (through curl on my mobile):

curl -X POST -d '{"source":"http://user:pass@public.host:5984/foo", "target":"http://remote:5984/foo"}' http://user:pass@pubic.host:5984/_replicate

The response in futon this morning:
W Processed source update #1066

... and it kept sitting there like it was stalled and only continued in smaller increments.

I restarted CouchDB and restarted from localhost - instant jump to 176 million.

I'm just wondering what might be different accept for that one is against the public interface, vs. localhost. I'd assume that replication behaves the same regardless.

  was:
So we had to restart replication on a server and here's something I noticed.

At first I restarted the replication via the following command from localhost:

curl -X POST -d '{"source":"http://localhost:5984/foo", "target":"http://remote:5984/foo"}' http://localhost:5984/_replicate

In response, futon stats:
W Processed source update #176841152

That part is great.

Last night I did not have immediate access to the shell so I restarted replication from remote:

curl -X POST -d '{"source":"http://user:pass@public.host:5984/foo", "target":"http://remote:5984/foo"}' http://user:pass@pubic.host:5984/_replicate

The response in futon this morning:
W Processed source update #1066

... and it kept sitting there like it was stalled and only continue in smaller increments.

I restarted CouchDB and restarted from localhost - instant jump to 176 million.

I'm just wondering what might be different accept for that one is against the public interface, vs. localhost. I'd assume that replication behaves the same regardless.


Spelling!

> Restarting replication 
> -----------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-782
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-782
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Replication
>    Affects Versions: 0.10
>         Environment: Ubuntu, 9.10
>            Reporter: Till Klampaeckel
>
> So we had to restart replication on a server and here's something I noticed.
> At first I restarted the replication via the following command from localhost:
> curl -X POST -d '{"source":"http://localhost:5984/foo", "target":"http://remote:5984/foo"}' http://localhost:5984/_replicate
> In response, futon stats:
> W Processed source update #176841152
> That part is great.
> Last night I did not have immediate access to the shell so I restarted replication from remote (through curl on my mobile):
> curl -X POST -d '{"source":"http://user:pass@public.host:5984/foo", "target":"http://remote:5984/foo"}' http://user:pass@pubic.host:5984/_replicate
> The response in futon this morning:
> W Processed source update #1066
> ... and it kept sitting there like it was stalled and only continued in smaller increments.
> I restarted CouchDB and restarted from localhost - instant jump to 176 million.
> I'm just wondering what might be different accept for that one is against the public interface, vs. localhost. I'd assume that replication behaves the same regardless.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.