Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 53380 invoked from network); 25 Jun 2010 19:00:57 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 25 Jun 2010 19:00:57 -0000 Received: (qmail 2433 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2010 19:00:57 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 2309 invoked by uid 500); 25 Jun 2010 19:00:56 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 2301 invoked by uid 99); 25 Jun 2010 19:00:56 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:00:56 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.7 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (athena.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [74.125.82.52] (HELO mail-ww0-f52.google.com) (74.125.82.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:00:48 +0000 Received: by wwb18 with SMTP id 18so188205wwb.11 for ; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: by 10.216.160.80 with SMTP id t58mr5410853wek.70.1277492426722; Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [172.10.20.3] ([82.132.248.11]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id l4sm1412950wej.32.2010.06.25.12.00.23 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 25 Jun 2010 12:00:26 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: 1.0 Vote Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1081) Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii From: Noah Slater In-Reply-To: X-Noah: Awesome Date: Fri, 25 Jun 2010 19:59:59 +0100 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: <00A52656-15F1-4837-8406-C860B01C08BD@tumbolia.org> References: <06785380-0D82-431A-9DF0-FFBCF019C4F5@apache.org> <7A2714AB-13AF-4E65-A51F-CA58467B97E6@tumbolia.org> <9CF6D94D-D1CF-48A8-AFD8-903CC8D13735@apache.org> <02AD8968-F757-4FBA-8E77-900673E6C0DD@tumbolia.org> <523C3F77-8922-4F16-B467-9C659C00CE46@apache.org> <3AAF584E-59F0-4F12-965E-12686F51ECCE@tumbolia.org> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1081) On 25 Jun 2010, at 19:48, Randall Leeds wrote: > I've been under the impression that 0.11.x was somewhat of a 1.0RC and > that's why there's been any discussion at all about branching 1.0 from > it. If this is the case nothing should need to be backported after the > 1.0 branch because there are no more 0.11.x releases, they are simply > 1.0.x. This is horribly broken. /branches/0.11.x is for BUG FIXES for /tags/0.11.n A user who is using 0.11.0 should be able to patch up bugs by upgrading = to 0.11.n without having to install 1.0. That is the whole purpose of = this kind of versioning and release procedure. Someone please tell me = this is still going to be the case? J Chris: What is happening to the 0.11.x branch after 0.1 is cut? Is it going to = revert to being a bug fixing branch for the exiting 0.11.n releases? If = not, then something is horribly horribly broken: either the plan for = releasing 0.1, or my understanding of the plan. I presume it is the latter, but could someone explain to me how I'm = confused? > The cleanest thing in my mind would be: > 1) branch 1.0.x from trunk > 2) revert any 1.1 junk on 1.0.x Sounds good. > 3) abandon the 0.11.x branch and don't cut any further releases from = it The 0.11.x branch is there for releasing bug fixes for 0.11.n, so it = will obviously stay.