From dev-return-10378-apmail-couchdb-dev-archive=couchdb.apache.org@couchdb.apache.org Wed Jun 23 23:23:02 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 13284 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2010 23:23:02 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 23 Jun 2010 23:23:02 -0000 Received: (qmail 29425 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2010 23:23:02 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 29346 invoked by uid 500); 23 Jun 2010 23:23:01 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 29338 invoked by uid 99); 23 Jun 2010 23:23:01 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:23:01 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW,SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.68.5.9] (HELO relay00.pair.com) (209.68.5.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Wed, 23 Jun 2010 23:22:52 +0000 Received: (qmail 67744 invoked from network); 23 Jun 2010 23:22:29 -0000 Received: from 74.1.186.35 (HELO ?10.0.1.205?) (74.1.186.35) by relay00.pair.com with SMTP; 23 Jun 2010 23:22:29 -0000 X-pair-Authenticated: 74.1.186.35 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1078) Subject: Re: 1.0 Vote From: Damien Katz In-Reply-To: Date: Wed, 23 Jun 2010 16:22:29 -0700 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Message-Id: References: To: dev@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1078) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Jun 23, 2010, at 4:15 PM, Paul Davis wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2010 at 6:47 PM, Damien Katz = wrote: >> I think we are really close to being ready for 1.0. >>=20 >> Are there any issues/patches that need to be handled before we make a = release and vote on it? >>=20 >> Noah, do you have any issues, and can you make the branch and release = candidate? >>=20 >> One thing I can think of is windows file support, so that compaction = and deletion work properly. There exists a fix for it from Mark Hammond, = but we need a patched Erlang VM before the fix can work. The upcoming = R14B includes the VM patch, but I think we should wait until it's = actually released before we include Mark's fix. >>=20 >> -Damien >=20 > If you mean the SHARED_DELETE thing for opening files, that was > included in R14A which was released the other day. I do mean the SHARED_DELETE thing, and I didn't know that. Great news! Anyone up for merging the patch and testing on windows? Patch is here: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-86 -Damien >=20 > Paul