couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Filipe David Manana <fdman...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: _replicator DB
Date Wed, 19 May 2010 14:16:34 GMT
I also tend to prefer having two separate DBs. For now, there are 2 specific
resources (users and replications) but tomorrow we can have 3, 4, 5, etc.

However, a single _system DB would help with the max_open_dbs and _stats :)



On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 2:32 PM, Simon Metson <simonmetson@googlemail.com>wrote:

> +1
>
>
> On 19 May 2010, at 12:59, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
>
>  having dedicated endpoints for specific resources sounds more reasonable
>> to me, than having a single endpoint for misc stuff. just my 2ct
>>
>>
>> On 19.05.2010, at 13:39, Dirkjan Ochtman wrote:
>>
>>  On Wed, May 19, 2010 at 13:13, Robert Dionne
>>> <dionne@dionne-associates.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> This sounds like a good approach, if I get the gist of it, it makes the
>>>> replication state persistent. We also have a _users db now, is this a good
>>>> time to think about consolidating and having one _system database ?
>>>>
>>>
>>> I too like the proposal, but I'd also prefer a single _system db
>>> rather than a bunch of specific databases.
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Dirkjan
>>>
>>
>>
>


-- 
Filipe David Manana,
fdmanana@gmail.com

"Reasonable men adapt themselves to the world.
Unreasonable men adapt the world to themselves.
That's why all progress depends on unreasonable men."

Mime
  • Unnamed multipart/alternative (inline, None, 0 bytes)
View raw message