Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jchris@gmail.com designates
 209.85.211.175 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=content-type:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date
         :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to:x-mailer;
        b=JBHwzJbv9raAwd1r5LsuKIoy97InR6QtCxckjDo72jT6kycQl+Z4byYQxkoZ3lsZn4
         cO3yYfHNJPDiWKBrLcoxooZVU9UTTYWNrb0E9TfkYFkjLUEFo6FACk5uO84BHHp+EUds
         Gm7DHPkmn/+TXTph0WMdrBVWcCBZyhcQVBaTc=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1077)
Subject: Re: 1.0 Code Management
From: J Chris Anderson <jchris@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <s2nec7a93a1004061900le4f75ce5l19bd9c8dad1f1607@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 6 Apr 2010 19:34:39 -0700
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <745520CC-AC3A-41F8-8484-5D2AAAB40D79@gmail.com>
References: <F2325EAE-A6F3-4EA4-831A-752CCF8149E5@apache.org>
 <h2i8bdf4e0e1004051516g420a0b12u29dae34fd1285a03@mail.gmail.com>
 <35450F4D-C1BD-4DBB-A78B-75CFEB5C9F16@apache.org>
 <s2nec7a93a1004061900le4f75ce5l19bd9c8dad1f1607@mail.gmail.com>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org


On Apr 6, 2010, at 7:00 PM, Randall Leeds wrote:

> I know I would like to throw some patches down in the coming weeks and =
while
> i'd love for some to hit 1.0 I recognize the need for extreme =
conservatism
> with respect to the 1.0 branch as adoption picks up for a stable =
release.
>=20
> +1 on cutting 1.0 from the 0.11.x branch. In my head 1.0 =3D=3D=3D =
0.11.1.
>=20

I agree on branching 1.0.x from 0.11.x, and not restricting trunk.

There is some stuff in trunk (and a lot of stuff on Jira) that should go =
into 0.11.1. I plan to do some patch vetting and applying over the next =
couple of weeks.

I can imagine 0.11.1 being released before 1.0 -- maybe 0.11.1 really =
will be treated as a release candidate for 1.0, so we can get a lot of =
eyes on it, and branch 1.0 from the 0.11.x branch after we've had a =
chance to make sure our 0.11.x bugfixes don't have any surprises.

The one feature I'd like to see in 1.0 (that we've been talking about =
for a while) is the _replicator db. It'd be great to get that out for =
testing as part of 0.11.1 as well.

I've set aside some time in the next few weeks to work on the =
_replicator db. I'll be sure to describe my approach etc with this list =
so there aren't surprises. I think it's a pretty straightforward feature =
(if you want to discuss this now, please reply in a new thread, let's =
not muddy this one).

Chris

> On Apr 6, 2010 5:33 PM, "Adam Kocoloski" <kocolosk@apache.org> wrote:
>=20
> On Apr 5, 2010, at 6:16 PM, Tim Smith wrote:
>=20
>> On Sat, Apr 3, 2010 at 11:53 AM, Jan Lehnardt <jan@a...
> I'd also like to cut 1.0 from the 0.11 branch and not have any =
restrictions
> on what lands in trunk.  Best,
>=20
> Adam