Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 87239 invoked from network); 31 Mar 2010 11:42:36 -0000 Received: from unknown (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by 140.211.11.9 with SMTP; 31 Mar 2010 11:42:36 -0000 Received: (qmail 81089 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2010 11:42:36 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 80974 invoked by uid 500); 31 Mar 2010 11:42:35 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 80966 invoked by uid 99); 31 Mar 2010 11:42:35 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:42:35 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.2 required=10.0 tests=AWL,FREEMAIL_FROM,RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE,SPF_PASS,T_TO_NO_BRKTS_FREEMAIL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of skippy.hammond@gmail.com designates 209.85.160.52 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.160.52] (HELO mail-pw0-f52.google.com) (209.85.160.52) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 11:42:27 +0000 Received: by pwi1 with SMTP id 1so254739pwi.11 for ; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:42:07 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=5i9OhjoV9+oB/PFO5ivmVvJnEes5MLsyFHH9ifTquDc=; b=QwMwMbZmhpAbhyyb+obU4VrATet3bgrNcVb0+fuaaYvWsd9f5o+GYGhvrUOtm3OhXL c//F6FPIjps3qhmp8t0wpjfJ4Ai5ZfW1UHyyMxJvezf3+LYiPAIZCLs8eHduuYuKfYBT iYqe0mWGT6UsVOdiziksv2WHMm0HM3/6c0hmw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:cc:subject :references:in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=vYr5q/cQAbAyqtVhiFcRxOtJrwc/FJsW0MH7Qz/ALffEYK7FEtMY4z1M6uLxRjEtMM y4fMfHSTcoP9XqhcgTwyRVLFi+s/FvBtBz9SUkeE26lCwr/YxPM2USv3m65As4QhODgy uK7PL7kdlPg8yBs88Qli9JDxLeI+gysKFx7Z0= Received: by 10.141.108.19 with SMTP id k19mr1364296rvm.110.1270035727062; Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:42:07 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.0.3] (ppp118-209-150-13.lns20.mel6.internode.on.net [118.209.150.13]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm5883312pzk.6.2010.03.31.04.42.04 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Wed, 31 Mar 2010 04:42:06 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4BB3350D.6070004@gmail.com> Date: Wed, 31 Mar 2010 22:42:05 +1100 From: Mark Hammond User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 6.1; en-GB; rv:1.9.1.8) Gecko/20100227 Thunderbird/3.0.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 To: dev@couchdb.apache.org CC: Jan Lehnardt Subject: Re: (lack of) couchdb windows binaries References: <4BB134A9.40709@skippinet.com.au> <3E309DFB-8E57-4001-9B13-F733BE9346F0@me.com> <4BB14CD2.9040700@gmail.com> <4BB29F57.5080309@gmail.com> <1B8FEE7B-11CF-4E80-B405-5429EE102E9A@me.com> <40548C34-20E3-419E-8DE5-772B3047DE68@apache.org> In-Reply-To: <40548C34-20E3-419E-8DE5-772B3047DE68@apache.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 31/03/2010 10:09 PM, Jan Lehnardt wrote: > I'm on it. > > Mark, aside from Erlang, Spidermonkey and ICU, are there any other > pieces in the installer, like Windows dev-tools/libs? libcurl is still in the build instructions even though I'm not sure it is currently used. The MS C runtime libraries are also included, but they are a requirement for practically all binaries built with the MS compiler, so is almost certainly already distributed with the Apache web server etc... Thanks, Mark > > Cheers Jan -- > > > > On 31 Mar 2010, at 13:00, Noah Slater wrote: > >> >> On 31 Mar 2010, at 02:03, Mark Hammond wrote: >> >>> Great - it can be found at >>> http://people.apache.org/~mhammond/dist/0.11.0/ >> >> Would you like to call the vote on this yourself? If you prepared >> the Windows artefacts, and called the vote, that should remove the >> dependancy chain between me and you - as well as speeding things up >> quite a bit, and taking a little bit of the load of my back. Can I >> just double check that you prepared this from THE source artefact? >> >>> Sorry, but this needs to be undertaken by someone who actually >>> believes there is an issue and can articulate it. >> >> Not true, it just needs to be done by someone who understands how >> the package is built. >> >> The purpose of legal-discuss is for developers who generally don't >> know or care about the legal things to get a "yea" or a "nay" from >> people who do. It would be enough simply for you to tell them what >> you've put into the artefact, and how it's built, and then just ask >> them for a thumbs up before the vote. >> >> To re-itterate, you don't have to think there is a problem, or >> describe any legal issue. All you have to do is provide a >> description of how you packaged CouchDB for Windows, and ask them >> for approval. They may ask you a few technical questions (ones >> which I could not answer, for example - and I don't fancy playing >> chinese whispers for people) to get clarification on a few points - >> but it shouldn't be anything you can't answer. >> >> If you're going to be part of the release process here, it would >> make sense for you to get involved with legal-discuss. >> >