Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of david.coallier@gmail.com
 designates 209.85.218.211 as permitted sender)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type;
        b=TO179zs0AqzyZiV/EJ8rgRE2rMdRGJf/CkAobtlUathaeZiZUdB258ukJEyoZvn7tT
         yV75pS/VMTsjUF0nKdi0nrSBH8ZIpYxQN2IzhTkWuUF9pFmdQNqfhwdJAtCwUkXaErOB
         w1QG3AOcEfu3OQL36RmxwcEJfKxWC7+SKSkjM=
MIME-Version: 1.0
Date: Wed, 27 Jan 2010 18:21:03 +0000
Message-ID: <b5f7bf6c1001271021m7aaed473gedff0f8cf609413c@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Time processing difference between 0.11.0b898401 and 0.11.0b903617
From: David Coallier <david.coallier@gmail.com>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8

Hey lads,

I'm suspecting a bug but before I report I was wondering if anyone was
aware of a change that would have happened between 0.11.0b898401 and
0.11.0b903617.

The problem is quite simple, I have a few on 0.11.0b898401 that pretty
much does that:

function(doc) {
  var x = new Date(1264515335 * 1000);
  emit(x, null);
}


Which outputs "2010-01-26T14:15:35Z" which is expected.

Then on the second server which is version: 0.11.0b903617 (Which is
also a replica of the first example -- continuous) if you run the same
function be it _temp or not:
function(doc) {
  var x = new Date(1264515335 * 1000);
  emit(x, null);
}

You get the {} as the key.

Anyone's got an idea what might have happened?

-- 
Slan,
David