Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 91921 invoked from network); 22 Dec 2009 20:14:17 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 22 Dec 2009 20:14:17 -0000 Received: (qmail 60720 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 20:14:16 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 60621 invoked by uid 500); 22 Dec 2009 20:14:16 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 60608 invoked by uid 99); 22 Dec 2009 20:14:16 -0000 Received: from athena.apache.org (HELO athena.apache.org) (140.211.11.136) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:14:16 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-1.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,HTML_MESSAGE X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: domain of jabronson@gmail.com designates 209.85.223.190 as permitted sender) Received: from [209.85.223.190] (HELO mail-iw0-f190.google.com) (209.85.223.190) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 20:14:09 +0000 Received: by iwn28 with SMTP id 28so4530228iwn.13 for ; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:13:49 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type; bh=8JsoCQnaoKYQZkyKg7GD6F9X9PPYsmxkt1AWG21QPSA=; b=lu/1SeKePXEyjLSvTcLyQ7RlbIk3G5mpeqRpn8Nj+6Hr0QkIR+rk5o1ddUDlgyHAp4 kQURcn03uQsnp50FNYpyaEwwSfsZnfKsxi7D0qfvLRvb6CTfgWAcJtJ92SeGKIVJFa+y Lfj1qJv15PrEFzhziLWvOqbUeeyPL95L2Ib+0= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type; b=JEy3fHQeICdO+N3cwkxy4JaPlSccmbxZnQm3xACMZ4LacbXRHYD8nOcgnULnpuKtxa B7JC4PPrhOwSsT1GdUs/8nCCGSbS/cUF1Wt+Pb3Hu0tMQ3h1mtdt4QW3GKfbLkc1cTQc HQwalS3oHWVSLYoBo2RAIdDzHMbpnywxN5/HY= MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.231.29.149 with SMTP id q21mr3615834ibc.35.1261512829067; Tue, 22 Dec 2009 12:13:49 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <299cc2dd0912221038r35e2bd1ckef5c217b4a84c870@mail.gmail.com> References: <299cc2dd0912221038r35e2bd1ckef5c217b4a84c870@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 22 Dec 2009 15:13:49 -0500 Message-ID: <299cc2dd0912221213v689a72es8032090c04e4129e@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: partial compaction? From: Joshua Bronson To: dev Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=00151774051c0e61fb047b56d838 --00151774051c0e61fb047b56d838 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 On Tue, Dec 22, 2009 at 1:38 PM, Joshua Bronson wrote: > I was thinking it would be cool to be able to specify some number of most > recent revisions to preserve during compaction. In some cases you only care > about e.g. the two most recent revisions of a document, and don't care about > the hundreds of older revisions that are just wasting space. > I just found the History Proposalthread from August which addresses this -- apologies for starting the new thread! Has there been any progress since then? --00151774051c0e61fb047b56d838--