couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Benoit Chesneau (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-604) _changes feed with ?feed=continuous does not return valid JSON
Date Mon, 21 Dec 2009 14:58:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-604?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793222#action_12793222
] 

Benoit Chesneau commented on COUCHDB-604:
-----------------------------------------

What you describe is by the way the old behavior of _changes continuous feed. I agree that
we fail on validation in timeout scenario (though it's easy to solve it on client side). The
one problem with old behaviour  I see with it is the extra time you have when you really want
continuous changes ie :

1) test if lines start with {'results
2) test if line is {}
3) remove the ","
4) finally deserialize.

Actually you just have to listen changes, get the line, handle it which is a way easier, faster.
And you still can create a valid json parser at the end. We need to choose what is the best
here, validation or fast handling.


> _changes feed with ?feed=continuous does not return valid JSON
> --------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-604
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-604
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HTTP Interface
>    Affects Versions: 0.10
>            Reporter: Joscha Feth
>            Priority: Trivial
>
> When using the _changes interface via ?feed=continuous the JSON returned is rather 
> a stream of JSON documents than a valid JSON file itself:
> {"seq":38,"id":"f473fe61a8a53778d91c38b23ed6e20f","changes":[{"rev":"9-d3e71c7f5f991b26fe014d884a27087f"}]}
> {"seq":68,"id":"2a574814d61d9ec8a0ebbf43fa03d75b","changes":[{"rev":"6-67179f215e42d63092dc6b2199a3bf51"}],"deleted":true}
> {"seq":70,"id":"75dbdacca8e475f5909e3cc298905ef8","changes":[{"rev":"1-0dee261a2bd4c7fb7f2abd811974d3f8"}]}
> {"seq":71,"id":"09fb03236f80ea0680a3909c2d788e43","changes":[{"rev":"1-a9646389608c13a5c26f4c14c6863753"}]}
> to be valid there needs to be a root element (and then an array with commata) like in
the non-continuous feed:
> {"results":[
> {"seq":38,"id":"f473fe61a8a53778d91c38b23ed6e20f","changes":[{"rev":"9-d3e71c7f5f991b26fe014d884a27087f"}]},
> {"seq":68,"id":"2a574814d61d9ec8a0ebbf43fa03d75b","changes":[{"rev":"6-67179f215e42d63092dc6b2199a3bf51"}],"deleted":true},
> {"seq":70,"id":"75dbdacca8e475f5909e3cc298905ef8","changes":[{"rev":"1-0dee261a2bd4c7fb7f2abd811974d3f8"}]},
> {"seq":71,"id":"09fb03236f80ea0680a3909c2d788e43","changes":[{"rev":"1-a9646389608c13a5c26f4c14c6863753"}]},
> in short this means that if someone does not parse the change events in an object like
manner (e.g. waiting for a line-ending and then parsing the line), but using a SAX-like parser
(throwing events of each new object, etc.) and expecting the response to be JSON (which it
is not, because its not {x:[{},{},{}]} but {}{}{} which is not valid) there is an error thrown.
> I can see, that people doing this line by line might be okay with the above approach,
but the response is not valid JSON and it would be nice if there were a flag to make the response
valid JSON.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message