couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From "Robert Newson (JIRA)" <j...@apache.org>
Subject [jira] Commented: (COUCHDB-356) batch=ok should take a wait=true option
Date Mon, 21 Dec 2009 17:30:18 GMT

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-356?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12793271#action_12793271
] 

Robert Newson commented on COUCHDB-356:
---------------------------------------

It depends on the size of the data inbetween headers. In my case, I have 1k of document and
~60k of attachment per document, so the overhead vanishes. If you have smaller documents and
no attachments, then the overhead is much higher, but your database is also much smaller,
so compaction is much more feasible.


> batch=ok should take a wait=true option
> ---------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: COUCHDB-356
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/COUCHDB-356
>             Project: CouchDB
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: HTTP Interface
>            Reporter: Chris Anderson
>             Fix For: 0.11
>
>
> This would hold the connection to the client until the document has been committed, instead
of returning immediately with a 202 Accepted

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.


Mime
View raw message