couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Vlad GURDIGA <gurd...@gmail.com>
Subject Re: make check fails
Date Tue, 17 Nov 2009 09:30:19 GMT
On Tue, Nov 17, 2009 at 10:16 AM, Paul Joseph Davis
<paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
>
> On Nov 17, 2009, at 2:24 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gurdiga@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 8:42 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Mon, Nov 16, 2009 at 6:05 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gurdiga@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 5:54 PM, Paul Davis
>>>> <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 10:47 AM, Paul Davis
>>>>> <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Fri, Nov 13, 2009 at 8:15 AM, Vlad GURDIGA <gurdiga@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm not sure it's the right list to send this, so, excuse me
if I'm
>>>>>>> wrong, and please advise.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Here is the report of my "make check": http://pastie.org/697173
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If more logs are needed, let me know.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Can you paste the output of running this from the  CouchDB src
>>>>>> directory?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> $ prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Also, does ./utils/run work for you?
>>>>
>>>> Looks good:
>>>>
>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ pwd
>>>> /home/vladd/src/couchdb
>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$ ./utils/run
>>>> Apache CouchDB 0.11.0b835834 (LogLevel=info) is starting.
>>>> Apache CouchDB has started. Time to relax.
>>>> [info] [<0.29.0>] Apache CouchDB has started on http://127.0.0.1:5984/
>>>> ^C
>>>> [vladd@kpax couchdb]$
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> After starting it with ./utils/run I've tried to run the "Test Suite"
>>>> from Futon and the only failing tests are oauth, replication, and
>>>> security_validation.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Paul Davis
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>> Vlad,
>>>
>>> $ ERL_FLAGS="-pa ./test/etap" prove -v test/etap/*.t
>>
>> This still seems to fail some tests: http://pastie.org/702238.
>>
>> I even "svn update"-d a minute ago and retried ./bootstrap &&
>> ./configure && make && make check, but it still has some failures:
>> http://pastie.org/702240.
>>
>> On my home 32-bit FC11, everything seems to be okay, I've checked last
>> night. :-/ I'm kinda tensed that it may be that is something I'm doing
>> wrong, or I'm missing something, or it's something wrong with my
>> 64-bit FC11?! What else should I check to make sure it's not the case
>> and I'm not wasting your time?
>>
>> Thank you!
>>
>>
>>>
>>> or
>>>
>>> $ ./test/etap/run
>>>
>>> In the updates to the build system I added a helper in the test
>>> directory to specify paths to files. If run doesn't exist, you
>>> probably need to do:
>>>
>>> $ ./bootstrap && ./configure && make
>>>
>>> To get the new build system updates.
>>>
>>> HTH,
>>> Paul Davis
>>>
>
> Much closer. Can you run those individually to get the verbose output. If
> you still have a patched run.tpl you should make it "prove -v" in your diff.
>
> Then it should just be:
>
> $ ./test/etap/run test/etap/11*.t

OK, here it comes: http://pastie.org/702292

>
> You don't happen to have weird firewall rules that could prevent replication
> to 127.0.0.1 or anything right?  That's about the only reason I can think of
> that would allow 070 to pass but not the 11x replication tests.

Probably not: I'm using only localhost to access CouchDB, but for the
sake of this test I've shut down iptables.

> Paul Davis
>

Mime
View raw message