On 18 Nov 2009, at 00:13, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
> On 17 Nov 2009, at 16:20, Jan Lehnardt wrote:
>
>>
>> On 16 Nov 2009, at 20:33, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On 16 Nov 2009, at 19:27, Paul Davis wrote:
>>>
>>>> What version of Spidermonkey are you running?
>>>
>>> 1.9.1.4
>>>
>>>> The 0.10.x branch has been patched to
>>>> work with newer versions. Is this something we should patch, or should
>>>> I just have the check say "Your version of spidermonkey is too new" or
>>>> something else?
>>>
>>> If you like, but that would also prevent me from releasing. ;)
>>>
>>> I'm not about to downgrade my system to make the release, as such a thing isn't
possible.
>>>
>>> How hard will the backport be?
>>>
>>
>> I am okay with 0.9.x not supporting newer spidermonkeys.
>>
>> I'm happy to set you up with a box that has the correct dependencies installed to
make the release.
>
> It was indeed very simple. I committed a fix for 0.9.2.
> Thanks Paul for pointing in the right directions and
> verifying. Thanks Noah for testing.
That wasn't the whole story. I now backported (r882928) all of
COUCHDB-288 to the 0.9.x branch and tested it with the old
and new libmozjs. I think we (Noah) can roll the release now.
Noah, I accidentally committed to the 0.9.2 tag at first. I believe
you're going to delete it prior to packaging anyway, so I didn't
bother reverting my mistake.
Cheers
Jan
--
|