Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 59130 invoked from network); 8 Oct 2009 15:42:48 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Oct 2009 15:42:48 -0000 Received: (qmail 412 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2009 15:42:47 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 349 invoked by uid 500); 8 Oct 2009 15:42:47 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 336 invoked by uid 99); 8 Oct 2009 15:42:46 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:42:46 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [209.85.212.198] (HELO mail-vw0-f198.google.com) (209.85.212.198) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 15:42:36 +0000 Received: by vws36 with SMTP id 36so4781666vws.29 for ; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:42:15 -0700 (PDT) MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.220.108.39 with SMTP id d39mr2303853vcp.12.1255016535143; Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:42:15 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <4ACDF877.1020201@canonical.com> References: <4ACDF877.1020201@canonical.com> Date: Thu, 8 Oct 2009 08:42:14 -0700 Message-ID: <699204510910080842v3406cf36yf8ce43a5befce98@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 0.10.0 release, second round From: Christopher Brown To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org +1 OS X Snow Leopard, Erlang R13B01. 55 of 55 test(s) run, 0 failures (40161 ms) However, if I run multiple times in succession, I've seen several tests fail intermittently. Among them: stats, rev_stemming, and erlang_views. I've included the error from rev_stemming below. Are there leftover test artifacts or test race conditions I should avoid? rev_stemming: Assertion failed: db.open("bar", {revs:true})._revisions.ids.length == newLimit + 1 Assertion failed: docB2._conflicts[0] == docB1._rev) // We having already updated bar before setting the limit, so it's still got // a long rev history. compact to stem the revs. T(db.open("bar", {revs:true})._revisions.ids.length == newLimit + 1 Cheers, Chris On Thu, Oct 8, 2009 at 7:34 AM, eric casteleijn wrote: > Noah Slater wrote: >> >> Hello, >> >> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 0.10.0 release, second >> round. > > +1 > > Ubuntu 09.10beta (Karmic) > > 55 of 55 test(s) run, 0 failures (36202 ms) > > -- > - eric casteleijn > https://launchpad.net/~thisfred > http://www.canonical.com > -- Christopher Brown, VP of Engineering Opscode, Inc. T: (425) 281-0727, E: cb@opscode.com Twitter, IRC, Github: skeptomai