couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Adam Kocoloski <kocol...@apache.org>
Subject Re: couchdb & oauth
Date Sun, 18 Oct 2009 15:56:06 GMT
On Oct 18, 2009, at 11:48 AM, Benoit Chesneau wrote:

> On Sun, Oct 18, 2009 at 4:55 PM, Adam Kocoloski  
> <kocolosk@apache.org> wrote:
>>
>> Caveat: I haven't built any "real" system myself that relies on  
>> OAuth, I've
>> only helped out with the Canonical deployment.  But as far as I  
>> know, trunk
>> and the 0.10.x _branch_ fully support OAuth.  The 0.10.0 _release_  
>> has a bug
>> that breaks pull replication from an OAuth-protected server, but  
>> otherwise
>> it works. (More precisely, if you're running 0.10.0 and you  
>> replicate from
>> an OAuth-protected server of any version, it will break.  The bug  
>> affects
>> the replicator's HTTP client, not the server).
>
> mmm that could be annoying. Is this fixed in trunk ?

Yes.  I tried to say that above, but maybe I wasn't clear.  Sorry  
about that.

>> OAuth requests with query-string parameters seem to be a tricky  
>> issue in
>> general.  I believe a recent version of the Python OAuth library  
>> had a bug
>> that would cause it to generate bad Authorization headers when  
>> query-strings
>> params were used.  I think the latest version of that library has  
>> fixed that
>> bug.
>>
>> I'm not sure what you mean by "would it be possible to have devs in  
>> sync in
>> a 0.10.1?"  Coiuld you elaborate?  Best,
>>
>
> Was just thinking that if there were fix on 0.10 in trunk, maybe they
> could be in 0.10.1 branch. depending if such version will happen or
> not of course :)
>
>
> thanks for the answers anyway, it helps
>
> - benoƮt

Hi Benoit, I think we've got you covered.  I'm assuming an 0.10.1  
release, if there is one, will be built from the 0.10.x branch, and so  
I've backported the OAuth replication fix from trunk to 0.10.x. Cheers,

Adam
Mime
View raw message