Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 57361 invoked from network); 8 Sep 2009 13:50:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 8 Sep 2009 13:50:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 4258 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2009 13:50:07 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 4160 invoked by uid 500); 8 Sep 2009 13:50:06 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 4149 invoked by uid 99); 8 Sep 2009 13:50:06 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:50:06 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=10.0 tests=SPF_NEUTRAL X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy) Received: from [83.97.50.139] (HELO jan.prima.de) (83.97.50.139) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:49:55 +0000 Received: from [192.168.1.10] (g225149175.adsl.alicedsl.de [::ffff:92.225.149.175]) (AUTH: LOGIN jan, TLS: TLSv1/SSLv3,128bits,AES128-SHA) by jan.prima.de with esmtp; Tue, 08 Sep 2009 13:49:34 +0000 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1075.2) Subject: Re: CouchDB failing to open socket 5984 ? From: Jan Lehnardt In-Reply-To: <20090908133639.GA20090@uk.tiscali.com> Date: Tue, 8 Sep 2009 15:49:31 +0200 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <17B27607-D7F9-4738-A941-838103D26FA0@apache.org> References: <20090908133639.GA20090@uk.tiscali.com> To: dev@couchdb.apache.org X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1075.2) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org Hi Brian :) On 8 Sep 2009, at 15:36, Brian Candler wrote: > P.S. I see in the top-level README file it says: > > * Erlang OTP (>=R12B) (http://erlang.org/) > > I believe the minimum is at least R12B5, so I think that should be > corrected. If the minimum is now higher than that, then I missed it, > but it could explain my problem. Skip 7 more lines for an exact version requirement. Cheers Jan --