couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Chris Anderson <jch...@apache.org>
Subject Re: Varnish and Multi-doc Fetch?
Date Sun, 13 Sep 2009 06:11:38 GMT
On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 2:05 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 4:56 PM, Zachary Zolton
> <zachary.zolton@gmail.com> wrote:
>> AFAICT Paul is correct; it seems to be merely an omission from the
>> HTTP spec that GET requests don't explicitly forbid sending an entity
>> body. Moreover, if caching proxies don't respect the entity body, it
>> wont solve my original problem anyways.
>>
>> So, it seems the answer would be for my application to better
>> normalize my documents for efficient querying. (No surprise!)
>>
>> Too bad though, that did sound like a fun bite-size patch on which to
>> practice my Erlang...  :^D
>>
>
> Feel free to submit a patch to add the URL string parameter. Its been
> oft requested enough that it should probably go in. I'll get to it
> eventually otherwise.
>
> Paul Davis

This is related to a patch we need: a general JSON syntax for queries.
The idea is that instead of POSTing an array of keys to a view, you'd
post an array of query definition objects. This way you could do
multiple ranges, and other things.


>
>> On Fri, Sep 11, 2009 at 1:20 PM, Paul Davis <paul.joseph.davis@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>> We could also start supporting GET bodies :)
>>>
>>> Its not about us supporting GET bodies. Its about everyone else
>>> supporting them. And by everyone, I mean everyone from http client
>>> libraries to proxy implementations.
>>>
>>> Last I recall on the subject was that GET bodies only arguably exist
>>> because they're never explicitly forbidden. I'm not particularly
>>> familiar with all the details though so I could be wrong on that
>>> point.
>>>
>>> Paul Davis
>>>
>>
>



-- 
Chris Anderson
http://jchrisa.net
http://couch.io

Mime
View raw message