couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <...@apache.org>
Subject Re: svn commit: r814778 - in /couchdb/trunk: share/www/script/ share/www/script/test/ src/couchdb/
Date Mon, 14 Sep 2009 20:39:57 GMT

On 14 Sep 2009, at 21:44, Chris Anderson wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:23 PM, Adam Kocoloski  
> <kocolosk@apache.org> wrote:
>> On Sep 14, 2009, at 3:12 PM, Chris Anderson wrote:
>>
>>> On Mon, Sep 14, 2009 at 12:09 PM, Adam Kocoloski <kocolosk@apache.org 
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi devs, I'm all for this commit, but what should we do about our  
>>>> 0.10
>>>> "beta" release?  If our next release doesn't have  
>>>> _all_docs_by_seq I
>>>> think
>>>> the beta should deprecate or remove it.
>>>
>>> I think the plan is to leave both features in 0.10, with a  
>>> deprecation
>>> warning on all_docs_by_seq, but I'm open to whatever.
>>>
>>> Also, I don't know what a deprecation warning would look like. maybe
>>> just a tag at the top of the response saying:
>>> "notice":"_all_docs_by_seq is deprecated, please use _changes"
>>
>> +1 from me.
>>
>
> This commit makes me want to release 0.10. Trunk has moved distinctly
> into 0.11 territory now, so people on the edge are gonna get another
> bumpy ride for a few weeks. 0.10 would solve this.

LET'S DO IT!

Noah, do you have time to prepare the release?

Cheers
Jan
--


Mime
View raw message