couchdb-dev mailing list archives

Site index · List index
Message view « Date » · « Thread »
Top « Date » · « Thread »
From Jan Lehnardt <>
Subject Re: Second call for objections releasing 0.10
Date Tue, 22 Sep 2009 12:33:55 GMT

On 22 Sep 2009, at 06:50, Benoit Chesneau wrote:

> On Mon, Sep 21, 2009 at 6:50 PM, Jan Lehnardt <> wrote:
>> I think I see where this is coming from, but rather see it  
>> perceived that
>> bugfix updates to a stable branch should happen in a timely manner.  
>> We can't
>> hold back releases forever and we should demonstrate that we can  
>> release
>> 0.10.1 quickly, if needed.
> I didn't say apache process is bad anyway. I agree with you on this
> point. And I'm perfectly ok with agile development as you know that ;)
> But in any case, I find it isn't normal to have spurious logs in
> production that may have others side effects. This is difficult to
> have such logs when you have a product online or in tests and I
> wouldn't use a service that accept such logs without knowing if it has
> side effects or not (and then logs should be more quiet anyway to
> allow read of others). I just opened the bug because I was testing
> that when noah called for the release, but of course it could have
> been detected before and maybe that's the point. In my opinion,
> something could be done to test most of expected scenarios before
> release. It won't be perfect but in this case, it would have help I
> guess.
>> I hope this addresses your concern.
> Sure, sorry for my french. I didn't want to be rude. I was just
> worried that for once time couchdb could become unstable.

Heh, I didn't perceive your comment as rude. I was just worried that
we are stuck in a process that can be optimized. If you are confident
we can get bugfix releases out in a timely manner, I'm satisfied :)


View raw message