Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 80696 invoked from network); 11 Aug 2009 10:51:07 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 11 Aug 2009 10:51:07 -0000 Received: (qmail 39993 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2009 10:51:13 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 39910 invoked by uid 500); 11 Aug 2009 10:51:13 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 39900 invoked by uid 99); 11 Aug 2009 10:51:13 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:51:13 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=-0.0 required=10.0 tests=SPF_PASS X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received-SPF: pass (nike.apache.org: domain of cmlenz@gmx.de designates 213.165.64.20 as permitted sender) Received: from [213.165.64.20] (HELO mail.gmx.net) (213.165.64.20) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Tue, 11 Aug 2009 10:51:01 +0000 Received: (qmail invoked by alias); 11 Aug 2009 10:50:40 -0000 Received: from vpn.mediatis.de (EHLO [192.168.28.231]) [62.96.5.68] by mail.gmx.net (mp030) with SMTP; 11 Aug 2009 12:50:40 +0200 X-Authenticated: #2618757 X-Provags-ID: V01U2FsdGVkX1/72TRI35j74R8Ij5t+dUJjEoDVVhuPqp2eMMYiIU au1Jgyk54AVoy1 Message-Id: From: Christopher Lenz To: dev@couchdb.apache.org In-Reply-To: <20090811094600.GB2432@tumbolia.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Apache Maven/Maven repo (Re: Dependencies in SVN) Date: Tue, 11 Aug 2009 12:50:40 +0200 References: <1B94AFDC-F3FA-4CB2-89D5-388CC14C15B4@apache.org> <4B534231-D537-4C76-BB13-5A02CDFA046F@apache.org> <470F75B7-D249-41EB-B004-6B295B6BC046@jasondavies.com> <6BCA9C6F-4ACC-49F0-9596-0882CABBE24D@dionne-associates.com> <12C3FC18-2C3C-4FDD-93EA-4EC177739DAE@apache.org> <9149C867-0E1E-499D-8A01-C5040F511E0D@jasondavies.com> <20090811094600.GB2432@tumbolia.org> X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Y-GMX-Trusted: 0 X-FuHaFi: 0.64 X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On 11.08.2009, at 11:46, Noah Slater wrote: > On Tue, Aug 11, 2009 at 04:27:05AM -0400, Paul Davis wrote: >> Doh! I forgot to check what we might have still in MochiWeb's issue >> tracker. Still, another vote for getting our downstream patches >> organized into separate files and apply them with a script. Its win >> all around. > > If you see my follow up calling for Christopher Lenz to properly > document our > vendor directory, it might make sense to keep a directory of > separate patches, > that can be applied in batch as part of this process. I don't think keeping patches in a directory makes much sense, just apply them to the copy of the vendor code in trunk. Subversion keeps track of what's changed, being a version control system ;) Cheers, -- Christopher Lenz cmlenz at gmx.de http://www.cmlenz.net/