Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: neutral (nike.apache.org: local policy)
Message-Id: <A84D2653-5BDF-4C45-A518-0737F779C7CE@apache.org>
From: Damien Katz <damien@apache.org>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
In-Reply-To: <7F23E151-749B-4E79-8710-3039E8A142EF@apache.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936)
Subject: Re: Time for 0.10.0?
Date: Sun, 23 Aug 2009 10:08:44 -0400
References: <675A4636-277C-4248-9943-1D361FD6217C@apache.org>
 <7F23E151-749B-4E79-8710-3039E8A142EF@apache.org>


On Aug 23, 2009, at 10:00 AM, Curt Arnold wrote:

>
> On Aug 21, 2009, at 4:01 PM, Damien Katz wrote:
>
>> Any objections to creating a 0.10.0 branch?
>>
>> -Damien
>
>
> Is the cryptography notice issue settled?

>
> Also just noticed that a document reject during validate_doc_update  
> returns a HTTP 500.  Haven't checked the archives yet and maybe it  
> is by design, but seems wrong to me, the server is doing exactly  
> what it is supposed to do.
>
> I haven't checked the current status, but is the issue with CouchDB  
> accepting invalid UTF-8 sequences but then failing on queries still  
> a problem?  That seemed like a killer bug to me.
>
>
I don't know the status of these things, but bugs and issues don't  
prevent the creation of branch, only the release of a branch.

-Damien