Return-Path: Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@www.apache.org Received: (qmail 30498 invoked from network); 17 Aug 2009 22:17:40 -0000 Received: from hermes.apache.org (HELO mail.apache.org) (140.211.11.3) by minotaur.apache.org with SMTP; 17 Aug 2009 22:17:40 -0000 Received: (qmail 42589 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2009 21:18:00 -0000 Delivered-To: apmail-couchdb-dev-archive@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 42494 invoked by uid 500); 17 Aug 2009 21:18:00 -0000 Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm Precedence: bulk List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Post: List-Id: Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org Delivered-To: mailing list dev@couchdb.apache.org Received: (qmail 42484 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2009 21:18:00 -0000 Received: from nike.apache.org (HELO nike.apache.org) (192.87.106.230) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:18:00 +0000 X-ASF-Spam-Status: No, hits=0.0 required=10.0 tests= X-Spam-Check-By: apache.org Received: from [140.211.11.9] (HELO minotaur.apache.org) (140.211.11.9) by apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with SMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:17:56 +0000 Received: (qmail 1733 invoked by uid 99); 17 Aug 2009 21:17:16 -0000 Received: from localhost.apache.org (HELO [10.0.1.2]) (127.0.0.1) (smtp-auth username kocolosk, mechanism plain) by minotaur.apache.org (qpsmtpd/0.29) with ESMTP; Mon, 17 Aug 2009 21:17:16 +0000 Message-Id: <739FAA72-2760-4653-9E7A-EF16C523CBFE@apache.org> From: Adam Kocoloski To: dev@couchdb.apache.org In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed; delsp=yes Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v936) Subject: Re: Ready for 0.10 Release? Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 17:16:49 -0400 References: X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.936) X-Virus-Checked: Checked by ClamAV on apache.org On Aug 17, 2009, at 4:58 PM, Chris Anderson wrote: > Couchers, > > We've been sprinting extra hard for the last week to get a lot of new > power into CouchDB. I think we're close on Windows support, we just > got native view servers, we've added a bunch of robustness around > external process handling. There's a bunch more that's happened since > 0.9 but the point of this thread is not to list the changes, but to > see if there are patches that people feel should go in now, so they > make the 0.10 release. Hopefully this is a short list, as I think most > of the last-minute patching has been done, but if something's > important and easy, we shouldn't forget it. Hi Chris, I thought we were going to branch 0.10.x but wait at least a few weeks for more testing and bugfixes before releasing 0.10.0. So much code has been flying around ... Adam