Mailing-List: contact dev-help@couchdb.apache.org; run by ezmlm
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Received-SPF: pass (athena.apache.org: local policy)
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 22:29:59 +0100
From: Noah Slater <nslater@apache.org>
To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
Subject: Re: Ready for 0.10 Release?
Message-ID: <20090817212959.GA9968@tumbolia.org>
Mail-Followup-To: dev@couchdb.apache.org
References: <e282921e0908171358x1b3f2b71x7242eae7844bc689@mail.gmail.com>
 <20090817211037.GA9041@tumbolia.org>
 <e2111bbb0908171421x6cbf6c8fu5d53bab1c7262d5f@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <e2111bbb0908171421x6cbf6c8fu5d53bab1c7262d5f@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.18 (2008-05-17)

On Mon, Aug 17, 2009 at 05:21:30PM -0400, Paul Davis wrote:
> > I wasn't even aware that this had properly landed yet, and it would certainly
> > need to be simmered in trunk for a few months, with a wide call for testing,
> > before I would be happy shipping it.
>
> I'm pretty sure it hasn't landed quite yet, but Mark appears to be
> narrowing in on getting all of the build issues sorted. Is your
> concern mostly about testing the changes to the build system or
> testing the Windows build products? I could see putting in the
> necessary bits but not claiming full windows compatibility until its
> been in and tested over the duration of a release cycle or some such.

Changes like this should simmer in trunk for a few months.

I probably would ask the same for anything big.

I don't like the idea of rushing in loads of changes and then BOOM release.

That's a good way to ship lots of buggy code!

Thanks,

-- 
Noah Slater, http://tumbolia.org/nslater